Measuring Engagement in Fourth to Twelfth Grade Classrooms: The Classroom Engagement Inventory

被引:84
作者
Wang, Ze [1 ]
Bergin, Christi [2 ]
Bergin, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Assessment Resource Ctr, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
engagement; factor analysis; measurement invariance; scale development; OF-FIT INDEXES; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; HIGH-SCHOOL; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; GOAL ORIENTATIONS; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; MOTIVATION; ELEMENTARY;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000050
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Research on factors that may promote engagement is hampered by the absence of a measure of classroom-level engagement. Literature has suggested that engagement may have 3 dimensions-affective, behavioral, and cognitive. No existing engagement scales measure all 3 dimensions at the classroom level. The Classroom Engagement Inventory (CEI) was developed to fill this gap. In Study 1, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on data from 3,481 students from the 4th to 12th grade. The results suggested a 4-factor model of the CEI. Using these results, in Study 2 several items were revised and data were collected 1 year later from 4th to 12th grade students in the same school district as Study 1. Analyses were conducted on data from 3,560 students after data cleaning. A series of potential models was tested. The final results suggest a 5-factor 24-item CEI: (1) Affective Engagement, (2) Behavioral Engagement-Compliance, (3) Behavioral Engagement-Effortful Class Participation, (4) Cognitive Engagement, and (5) Disengagement. Results advance understanding of the construct of classroom engagement. The CEI fills a significant gap in measurement of engagement. The CEI is classroom level, measures multiple dimensions of engagement, uses self-report, is relatively short, and can be readily administered in classrooms from the 4th to 12th grade.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 535
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument
    Appleton, James J.
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Kim, Dongjin
    Reschly, Amy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) : 427 - 445
  • [2] Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout
    Archambault, Isabelle
    Janosz, Michel
    Fallu, Jean-Sebastien
    Pagani, Linda S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2009, 32 (03) : 651 - 670
  • [3] Asparouhov T., 2006, Robust chi-square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics, DOI DOI 10.1177/0013164416683754
  • [4] Bandura A, 1997, Self -Efficacy: The Exercise of Control
  • [5] On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA
    Beauducel, A
    Herzberg, PY
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (02) : 186 - 203
  • [6] Bergin D. A., 2009, ANN CONV ASS PSYCH S
  • [8] A Study of the Factorial Invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results From Middle and High School Students
    Betts, Joseph E.
    Appleton, James J.
    Reschly, Amy L.
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Huebner, E. Scott
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2010, 25 (02) : 84 - 93
  • [9] Brennan RL., 2001, GEN THEORY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0
  • [10] Measuring Student Engagement Among Elementary Students: Pilot of the Student Engagement Instrument-Elementary Version
    Carter, Chandra P.
    Reschly, Amy L.
    Lovelace, Matthew D.
    Appleton, James J.
    Thompson, Dianne
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2012, 27 (02) : 61 - 73