The Effect of Font Size on Children's Memory and Metamemory

被引:10
作者
Halamish, Vered [1 ]
Nachman, Hila [2 ,3 ]
Katzir, Tami [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Sch Educ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Edmond J Safra Brain Res Ctr Study Learning Disab, Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Haifa, Dept Learning Disabil & Special Educ, Haifa, Israel
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
children; font size; judgment of learning; memory; metamemory; PERCEPTUAL FLUENCY; METACOGNITIVE JUDGMENTS; LEARNING OUTCOMES; NAIVE THEORIES; DISFLUENCY; PERFORMANCE; TEXT; INTELLIGENCE; BELIEFS; ILLUSIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01577
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been a growing interest in the effect of perceptual features of learning materials on adults' memory and metamemory. Previous studies consistently have found that adults use font size as a cue when monitoring their learning, judging that they will remember large font size words better than small font size words. Most studies have not demonstrated a significant effect of font size on adults' memory, but a recent metaanalysis of these studies revealed a subtle memory advantage for large font words. The current study extended this investigation to elementary school children. First and fifth-sixth graders studied words for a free recall test presented in either large or small font and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for each word. As did adults, children predicted they would remember large font size words better than small font size words and, in fact, actually remembered the large font size words better. No differences were observed between the two age groups in the effect of font size on memory or metamemory. These results suggest that the use of font size as a cue when monitoring one's own learning is robust across the life span and, further, that this cue has at least some validity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 13 (03) :219-235
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1963, Legibility of Print
[3]  
Bjork EL., 2011, Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, P56
[4]  
Bjork RA., 1994, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, P185, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011
[5]  
Chall J.S., 1991, STAGES READING DEV
[6]   Fortune favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes [J].
Diemand-Yauman, Connor ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. ;
Vaughan, Erikka B. .
COGNITION, 2011, 118 (01) :111-115
[7]   Reading in examination-type situations: the effects of text layout on performance [J].
dos Santos Lonsdale, Maria ;
Dyson, Mary C. ;
Reynolds, Linda .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2006, 29 (04) :433-453
[8]   Mind the gap: Increased inter-letter spacing as a means of improving reading performance [J].
Dotan, Shahar ;
Katzir, Tami .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 174 :13-28
[9]   Recommendations for exploring the disfluency hypothesis for establishing whether perceptually degrading materials impacts performance [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Mueller, Michael L. .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2016, 11 (01) :123-131
[10]  
Dweck C.S., 1999, SELF THEORIES