Do public consultations work? The case of the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Bill

被引:14
作者
Kaehne, Axel [1 ]
Taylor, Helen [2 ]
机构
[1] Edge Hill Univ, Evidence Based Practice Res Ctr, Ormskirk, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Law & Polit, Cardiff CF10 3AX, S Glam, Wales
关键词
Participatory democracy; policy; public consultation; Welsh Government; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; GOVERNANCE NETWORKS; POLICY NETWORKS; PRIMARY-HEALTH; PARTNERSHIPS; DEVOLUTION; CITIZENS; SCRUTINY; CARE; UK;
D O I
10.1177/0952076715595676
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Conducting a public consultation is a popular way to draw on wider expertise in framing legislation in the UK. In Wales, low scrutinising capacity of a relatively small legislative chamber and limited civil service resources to prepare legislation may contribute to the popularity of consultations. Public consultations may also resonate with themes of inclusion and participation in Welsh governance. The Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Bill was the first large legislative project of the Welsh Government since gaining primary law making powers in 2011. This case study investigated the public consultation (conducted at Stage 1) for this bill in 2013. It used a coding matrix to analyse the submissions to the consultation. The findings reveal that individuals and organisations may struggle to effectively influence legislation. Using van Damme and Brans' interpretative framework, the article locates the findings within the context of citizen participation, consultation techniques and discusses the usefulness of analysing submissions as part of consultation evaluations. In addition, the article makes a case for triangulating a documentary analysis of submissions with conventional qualitative evidence in future consultation research.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 99
页数:20
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COOPERATION COOPERAT
[2]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[3]   Groups and the Limited Pluralism of the Set-Piece Consultation [J].
Beales, Danny ;
Carter, Anna ;
Chrispin, Juliet ;
Davies, Harry ;
Gammie, Catharine ;
Leighton, Ruth ;
Lopes-Sabino, Lourenco ;
Moore, Luke ;
Mulumba, Harmonie ;
Page, Edward C. ;
Randhawa, Zoe ;
Sammut, Joseph ;
Toberman, Annalise ;
Westgarth, Christopher .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2012, 14 (01) :175-186
[4]   Policy Networks and Governance Networks: Towards Greater Conceptual Clarity [J].
Blanco, Ismael ;
Lowndes, Vivien ;
Pratchett, Lawrence .
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2011, 9 (03) :297-308
[5]   Publics, patients, citizens, consumers? Power and decision making in primary health care [J].
Callaghan, Gillian. D. ;
Wistow, Gerald .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 84 (03) :583-601
[6]   Public consultation or political choreography? The Howard Government's quest for community views on defence policy [J].
Cheeseman, G ;
Smith, H .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2001, 55 (01) :83-100
[7]   Serving the Nation: Devolution and the Civil Service in Wales [J].
Cole, Alistair .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2012, 14 (03) :458-476
[8]   Consultation in local government: A case study of practice at Devon County Council [J].
Cole, M .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2004, 30 (02) :196-213
[10]   Evaluating and Theorising Committee Scrutiny: A UK Comparative Perspective [J].
Cole, Michael ;
McAllister, Laura .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2015, 41 (02) :220-239