Human friendship favours cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma

被引:49
作者
Majolo, Bonaventura [1 ]
Ames, Kaye [1 ]
Brumpton, Rachel [1 ]
Garratt, Rebecca [1 ]
Hall, Kate [1 ]
Wilson, Natasha [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Res Ctr Comparat Cognit, Dept Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
关键词
altruism; cooperation; defection; exploitation; friendship; prisoner's dilemma; reciprocity;
D O I
10.1163/156853906778987506
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the last decades, many studies have attempted to analyse the factors that may favour the evolution of cooperation. Among unrelated individuals, cooperation is expected to occur when partners exchange altruistic acts one another (i.e., reciprocity) or when the donor of an altruistic act may obtain secondary benefits from the act (e.g., increased reputation). The iterated prisoner's dilemma (IPD) is frequently used to analyse cooperation between two players. In this game, cooperation is constantly at risk of exploitation. Therefore, previous knowledge of the other player's attitude towards cooperation may positively affect an individual's decision to cooperate during the game. In various social species (including humans), cup members may form friendly relationships that reduce uncertainty about the partner response and increase the mutual exchange of benefits. In light of this, we analysed whether humans cooperate more when playing an IPD with a friend than with a stranger. Each subject played an IPD twice, with a friend and a stranger, and had 10 pound per round to donate or not to the other player. Our results evidenced that humans cooperate more with, and donate more money to the other player when playing with a friend than with a stranger. Moreover, in game two subjects playing with unfamiliar players followed a raise the stakes strategy (RTS), i.e. they donated more money as the game progressed. The sense of trust in the other player's willingness to reciprocate the altruistic act is probably an important pre-requisite favouring cooperation and it may explain the differences between friends and unfamiliar players. The use of a RTS strategy in game two, however, indicates that subjects were attempting to increase the level of cooperation with unfamiliar players. These findings are consistent with the observation that friendship (and the capacity to build cooperative relationships) may be beneficial to individuals in many social animals and in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1395
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Axelrod R, 2006, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
  • [2] Female baboons do not raise the stakes but they give as good as they get
    Barrett, L
    Henzi, SP
    Weingrill, T
    Lycett, JE
    Hill, RA
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 59 : 763 - 770
  • [3] Bell S., 1999, ANTHR FRIENDSHIP
  • [4] Building up relationships in asymmetric co-operation games between the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus and client reef fish
    Bshary, R
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2002, 52 (05) : 365 - 371
  • [5] Cords M., 1997, MACHIAVELLIAN INTELL, P24, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511525636.003
  • [6] The evolution of degrees of cooperation
    Frean, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 182 (04) : 549 - 559
  • [7] HAMILTON WD, 1964, J THEOR BIOL, V7, P1, DOI [10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4, 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6]
  • [8] Friendship, cliquishness, and the emergence of cooperation
    Hruschka, DJ
    Henrich, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [9] Reasoning about responsibilities and obligations in close relationships: A comparison across two cultures
    Keller, M
    Edelstein, W
    Schmid, C
    Fang, FX
    Fang, G
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 34 (04) : 731 - 741
  • [10] Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation
    Melis, Alicia P.
    Hare, Brian
    Tomasello, Michael
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 72 : 275 - 286