Hourly day-ahead wind power forecasting at two wind farms in northeast Brazil using WRF model

被引:46
作者
Jacondino, William Duarte [1 ]
Nascimento, Ana Lucia da Silva [2 ]
Calvetti, Leonardo [1 ]
Fisch, Gilberto [2 ]
Beneti, Cesar Augustus Assis [3 ]
da Paz, Sheila Radman [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Pelotas UFPEL, Av Idefonso Simoes Lopes 2751, BR-96060290 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, Av Astronautas 1758, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] Sistema Meteorol Parana SIMEPAR, Av Francisco H Dos Santos 210, BR-81531980 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
WRF; Onshore; Forecast; Wind power; Brazil; WEATHER RESEARCH; PARAMETERIZATION SCHEMES; SURFACE WINDS; PRECIPITATION; SENSITIVITY; RAINFALL; ONSHORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.120841
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Wind energy is rapidly growing industry in Brazil. Wind speed forecasting is necessary in the planning, controlling, and monitoring for the reliable and efficient operation of the wind power systems. Thus, this study focuses on the impact of different physics parameterization in forecasting wind speed in two onshore wind farms using the Weather and Research Forecasting (WRF) model. The wind farms are located in Parazinho, in the northeast of Brazil, a region with high wind resource. Hindcasts are per-formed for a high (i.e., July 2017) and low (i.e., April 2017) wind speed regimes using different forecast lead-times (i.e., 24-48 h). The best performing setup consists of Thompson microphysics, Bougeault-Lacarrere PBL, Betts-Miller cumulus, New Goddard Longwave/Shortwave radiation, and Pleim-Xiu Land Surface schemes. Our findings also suggest that the model forecast setting with the TKE closure scheme, namely BouLac, performed better than that setting with first-order closure ACM2. The best mean monthly error (MAE) obtained is 1.1 m s(-1) for wind and 12.6% for wind power. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Assessment of the weather research and forecasting model generalized parameterization schemes for advancement of precipitation forecasting in monsoon-driven river basins [J].
Sikder, Safat ;
Hossain, Faisal .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2016, 8 (03) :1210-1228
[32]  
Skamarock W. C., 2021, Note NCAR/ TN-4751STR, DOI [DOI 10.5065/D68S4MVH, 10.5065/D68S4MVH]
[33]   Probabilistic maximum-value wind prediction for offshore environments [J].
Staid, Andrea ;
Pinson, Pierre ;
Guikema, Seth D. .
WIND ENERGY, 2015, 18 (10) :1725-1738
[34]  
Stergiou I., 2017, Proceedings, V1, P119, DOI [DOI 10.3390/ECAS2017-, 10.3390/ecas2017-04138, DOI 10.3390/ECAS2017-04138]
[35]   Evaluation of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model on Forecasting Low-level Jets: Implications for Wind Energy [J].
Storm, Brandon ;
Dudhia, Jimy ;
Basu, Sukanta ;
Swift, Andy ;
Giammanco, Ian .
WIND ENERGY, 2009, 12 (01) :81-90
[36]   Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization [J].
Thompson, Gregory ;
Field, Paul R. ;
Rasmussen, Roy M. ;
Hall, William D. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2008, 136 (12) :5095-5115
[37]  
Tuchtenhagen P, 2014, WIND POWER ASSESSMEN, P390, DOI [10.5902/2179460X13148, DOI 10.5902/2179460X13148]
[38]  
Wei Wang CB, 2016, HA KATE FOSSELL ARW