The value of car ownership and use in the United States

被引:57
|
作者
Moody, Joanna [1 ]
Farr, Elizabeth [2 ]
Papagelis, Marisa [3 ]
Keith, David R. [4 ]
机构
[1] MIT Energy Initiat, Mobil Syst Ctr, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Wellesley Coll, Wellesley, MA 02181 USA
[4] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
MOBILITY; SERVICE; ACCESS; WILLINGNESS; MILLENNIALS; PARKING; PEOPLE; MAAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41893-021-00731-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is widely accepted that consumers underestimate the full cost of car ownership and that correcting this bias could meaningfully accelerate the adoption of shared mobility. Yet this argument fails to consider how much benefit consumers enjoy from owning their own vehicle. Here we estimate the value of private car ownership and use in four US metro areas-Chicago, Illinois; Dallas, Texas; Seattle, Washington; and Washington DC-using online discrete choice experiments. We find that, on average, people would need to be paid $11,197 to give up access to their privately owned vehicle for one year, which is at least as much as estimates of the average total private cost of vehicle ownership (similar to$9,000). Critically, we find that more than half of this value is non-use value-such as the option to travel whenever or wherever needed at a moment's notice and the status that comes from owning one's own vehicle-beyond the use value of getting from A to B. Further, this non-use value was found to be much higher during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings reframe the conversation around the transition away from private vehicle dependence, emphasizing the need to provide value and convenience if alternative mobility solutions are to be widely adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patterns of Cannabis Use among Women With HIV in the United States
    Haley, Danielle F.
    Bullington, Brooke W.
    Tien, Phyllis
    Knittel, Andrea K.
    Bobitt, Julie
    Kempf, Mirjam-Colette
    Philbin, Morgan
    Hanna, David B.
    Lindsey, StarrLa'diamond
    Kassaye, Seble
    Dehovitz, Jack
    Cohen, Mardge
    Wingood, Gina
    Jones, Deborah L.
    Williams, Michael P.
    Wang, Richard J.
    Edmonds, Andrew
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2025,
  • [32] A comparison of cardiovascular procedure use between the United States and Canada
    Verrilli, DK
    Berenson, R
    Katz, SJ
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 1998, 33 (03) : 467 - 487
  • [33] Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment
    Tierney, Katherine
    Cai, Yong
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (06) : 1136 - +
  • [34] A Sociobehavioral Wellness Model of Acupuncture Use in the United States, 2007
    Upchurch, Dawn M.
    Rainisch, Bethany Wexler
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2014, 20 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [35] United States older adults' willingness to use emerging technologies
    Kadylak, Travis
    Cotten, Shelia R.
    INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2020, 23 (05) : 736 - 750
  • [36] Minimum parking requirements and car ownership: An analysis of Swedish municipalities
    McAslan, Devon
    Sprei, Frances
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2023, 135 : 45 - 58
  • [37] Household parking facilities: relationship to travel behaviour and car ownership
    Christiansen, Petter
    Fearnley, Nils
    Hanssen, Jan Usterud
    Skollerud, Kare
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016, 2017, 25
  • [38] "Would it be weird to live here without a car?": Using social media to understand car ownership decisions
    Iacobucci, Evan
    TRANSPORTATION, 2024, 51 (02) : 475 - 500
  • [39] Joint car ownership and car type preference model considering engagement in online activities and environmental concern
    Kim, Junghwa
    Tanaka, Hideki S.
    Schmocker, Jan-Dirk
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 68 : 293 - 305
  • [40] Is car ownership reduction impact of car sharing lower than expected? A Europe wide empirical evidence
    Bucsky, Peter
    Juhasz, Mattias
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 10 (04) : 2208 - 2217