Role of Prophylactic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Biliary Stone Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
McCarty, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ]
Farrelly, James [3 ]
Njei, Basile [4 ]
Jamidar, Priya [4 ]
Muniraj, Thiruvengadam [4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Endoscopy, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Gen Surg Trauma & Crit Care, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Digest Dis, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
cholecystectomy; choledocholithasis; endoscopic cholangiopancreatography; gallbladder; gallstones; sphincterotomy; BILE-DUCT STONES; GALLBLADDER IN-SITU; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CALCULI; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; GALLSTONES; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003977
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a structured systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and complication rate of cholecystectomy deferral versus prophylactic cholecystectomy among patients post-endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Background: Although previous reports suggest a decreased risk of biliary complications with prophylactic cholecystectomy, biliary endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy may provide a role for deferring cholecystectomy with the gallbladder left in situ. Methods: Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were performed through August 2019 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Measured outcomes included: mortality, recurrent biliary pain or cholecystitis, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and eventual need for cholecystectomy. Random effects models were used to determine pooled effect size and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Nine studies (n = 1605) were included. A total of 53.8% (n = 864) patients had deferred cholecystectomy post-sphincterotomy. Deferral cholecystectomy as compared to prophylactic cholecystectomy resulted in a significant increased risk of mortality [odds raio (OR) 2.56 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.54-4.23); P < 0.0001; I-2 = 18.49]. Patients who did not undergo prophylactic cholecystectomy developed more recurrent biliary pain or cholecystitis [OR 5.10 (95% CI 3.39-7.67); P < 0.0001; I-2 = 0.00]. Rate of pancreatitis [OR 3.11 (95% CI 0.99-9.83); P = 0.053; I-2 = 0.00] and cholangitis [OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.74-2.98); P = 0.264; I-2 = 0.00] was unaffected. Overall, 26.00% (95% CI 14.00-40.00) of patients with deferred prophylactic cholecystectomy required eventual cholecystectomy. Conclusions: Prophylactic cholecystectomy remains the preferred strategy compared to a deferral approach with gallbladder in situ post-sphincterotomy for patients with bile duct stones. Future studies may highlight a subset of patients (ie, those with large balloon biliary dilation) that may not require cholecystectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 675
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cholecystectomy outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis
    Xu, Jie
    Yang, Chuang
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] Role of Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Management of Choledocholithiasis in High-risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khan, Muhammad Ali
    Khan, Zubair
    Tombazzi, Claudio R.
    Gadiparthi, Chiranjeevi
    Lee, Wade
    Wilcox, C. Mel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 52 (07) : 579 - 589
  • [3] Cholecystectomy outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis
    Jie Xu
    Chuang Yang
    BMC Gastroenterology, 20
  • [4] Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in cholelithiasis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Poprom, Napaphat
    Suragul, Wikran
    Muangkaew, Paramin
    Vassanasiri, Watoo
    Rungsakulkij, Narongsak
    Mingphruedhi, Somkit
    Tangtawee, Pongsatorn
    ANNALS OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2023, 27 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [5] Comparing the efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilation alone and combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Jie
    Mu, Ning
    He, Yaxi
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (01) : 163 - 172
  • [6] Does endoscopic sphincterotomy reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after biliary stenting? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sofi, Aijaz Ahmed
    Nawras, Ali
    Alaradi, Osama Habib
    Alastal, Yaseen
    Khan, Muhammed Ali
    Lee, Wade M.
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 28 (04) : 394 - 404
  • [7] The role of cholecystectomy following endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal
    Toogood, K.
    Pike, T.
    Coe, P.
    Everett, S.
    Huggett, M.
    Paranandi, B.
    Bassi, V
    Toogood, G.
    Smith, A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2023, 105 (07) : 607 - 613
  • [8] Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy
    van Geenen, E. J. M.
    van der Peet, D. L.
    Mulder, C. J. J.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    Bruno, M. J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (05): : 950 - 956
  • [9] Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis
    Qi, Sheng
    Xu, Jie
    Yan, Chao
    He, Yanan
    Chen, Yao
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (36) : E34884
  • [10] Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Large Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Lei
    Kyaw, Moe Htet
    Tse, Yee Kit
    Lau, James YunWong
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015