Intra-operative nerve monitoring and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis of prospective studies

Purpose Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a feared complication of thyroid surgery occurring in 1-5% of cases. The present approaches to RLN preservation include RLN visualization with no nerve monitoring (No-NM), intermittent intra-operative nerve monitoring (I-IONM) and continuous intra-operative nerve monitoring (C-IONM). There is ambiguity as to which of these strategies should be the preferred method of RLN preservation. Methods A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Collaboration databases was undertaken with network meta-analysis (NMA) performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Only prospective studies were included. Results Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 22,080 patients and 40,642 nerves at risk (NAR). Overall, 23,364 NARs (57.5%) underwent I-IONM, 17,176 (42.3%) No-NM and 98 (0.2%) underwent C-IONM. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery (I-IONM vs.No-NM, OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.55-1.19; C-IONM vs. No-NM, OR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.02-5.00). Pooled analysis showed that IONM (I-IONM or C-IONM) demonstrated a protective effect versus No-NM in reducing the incidence of transient RLN injury (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, p = 0.03). Conclusions IONM strategies did not significantly reduce the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery. However, the small number of C-IONM NARs limits conclusions that may be drawn. Further well-designed prospective studies will be required to definitively assess the utility of C-IONM.