Revisiting element removal for density-based structural topology optimization with reintroduction by Heaviside projection

被引:21
作者
Behrou, Reza [1 ]
Lotfi, Reza [1 ]
Carstensen, Josephine Voigt [1 ,2 ]
Ferrari, Federico [1 ]
Guest, James K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Civil & Syst Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Civil Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Topology optimization; Adaptive boundary conditions; Element removal; Computational efficiency; Projection method; Eigenvalue optimization; INTERPOLATION SCHEME; CONTINUUM STRUCTURES; LENGTH SCALE; DESIGN; MINIMUM; REANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2021.113799
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We present a strategy grounded in the element removal idea of Bruns and Tortorelli (2003) and aimed at reducing computational cost and circumventing potential numerical instabilities of density-based topology optimization. The design variables and the relative densities are both represented on a fixed, uniform finite element grid, and linked through filtering and Heaviside projection. The regions in the analysis domain where the relative density is below a specified threshold are removed from the forward analysis and replaced by nodal boundary conditions. This brings a progressive cut of the computational cost as the optimization proceeds and helps to mitigate numerical instabilities associated with low-density regions. Removed regions can be readily reintroduced since all the design variables remain active and are modeled in the formal sensitivity analysis. A key feature of the proposed approach is that the Heaviside projection promotes material reintroduction along the structural boundaries by amplifying the magnitude of the sensitivities inside the filter reach. Several 2D and 3D structural topology optimization examples are presented, including linear and nonlinear compliance minimization, the design of a force inverter, and frequency and buckling load maximization. The approach is shown to be effective at producing optimized designs equivalent or nearly equivalent to those obtained without the element removal, while providing remarkable computational savings. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method [J].
Allaire, G ;
Jouve, F ;
Toader, AM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 194 (01) :363-393
[2]   On reducing computational effort in topology optimization: how far can we go? [J].
Amir, Oded ;
Sigmund, Ole .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 44 (01) :25-29
[3]   Efficient use of iterative solvers in nested topology optimization [J].
Amir, Oded ;
Stolpe, Mathias ;
Sigmund, Ole .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 42 (01) :55-72
[4]   Approximate reanalysis in topology optimization [J].
Amir, Oded ;
Bendsoe, Martin P. ;
Sigmund, Ole .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 78 (12) :1474-1491
[5]   Adaptive topology optimization for incompressible laminar flow problems with mass flow constraints [J].
Behrou, Reza ;
Ranjan, Ram ;
Guest, James K. .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 346 :612-641
[6]  
Bendsoe MP, 2003, TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATIO, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6
[7]  
Bonet J, 2008, NONLINEAR CONTINUUM MECHANICS FOR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511755446
[8]   An element removal and reintroduction strategy for the topology optimization of structures and compliant mechanisms [J].
Bruns, TE ;
Tortorelli, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2003, 57 (10) :1413-1430
[9]   Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms [J].
Bruns, TE ;
Tortorelli, DA .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (26-27) :3443-3459
[10]   Stiffness design of geometrically nonlinear structures using topology optimization [J].
Buhl, T ;
Pedersen, CBW ;
Sigmund, O .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2000, 19 (02) :93-104