Walking the line: Understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis

被引:32
作者
Read, Gemma J. M. [1 ]
Salmon, Paul M. [2 ]
Lenne, Michael G. [1 ]
Stanton, Neville A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Sunshine Coast, Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[3] Univ Southampton, Transportat Res Grp, Maritime Environm Engn & Sci Unit, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Rail level crossings; Pedestrians; Cognitive work analysis; Constraints; Systems approach; Risk; CRITICAL DECISION METHOD; STRATEGIES ANALYSIS; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; DRIVERS; MODEL; SAFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Pedestrian fatalities at rail level crossings (RLXs) are a public safety concern for governments worldwide. There is little literature examining pedestrian behaviour at RLXs and no previous studies have adopted a formative approach to understanding behaviour in this context. In this article, cognitive work analysis is applied to understand the constraints that shape pedestrian behaviour at RLXs in Melbourne, Australia. The five phases of cognitive work analysis were developed using data gathered via document analysis, behavioural observation, walk-throughs and critical decision method interviews. The analysis demonstrates the complex nature of pedestrian decision making at RLXs and the findings are synthesised to provide a model illustrating the influences on pedestrian decision making in this context (i.e. time, effort and social pressures). Further, the CWA outputs are used to inform an analysis of the risks to safety associated with pedestrian behaviour at RLXs and the identification of potential interventions to reduce risk. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 227
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Work domain analysis for air traffic controller weather displays
    Ahlstrom, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (02) : 159 - 169
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1977, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
  • [3] Australian Transport Safety Bureau, 2012, AUSTR RAIL SAF OCC D
  • [4] Cognitive Work Analysis for safe and efficient driving
    Birrell, Stewart A.
    Young, Mark S.
    Jenkins, Daniel P.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2012, 13 (04) : 430 - 449
  • [5] Evaluation of ecological interface design for nuclear process control: Situation awareness effects
    Burns, Catherine M.
    Skraaning, Gyrd, Jr.
    Jamieson, Greg A.
    Lau, Nathan
    Kwok, Jordanna
    Welch, Robin
    Andresen, Gisle
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2008, 50 (04) : 663 - 679
  • [6] Boundary, purpose, and values in work-domain models: Models of naval command and control
    Burns, CM
    Bryant, DJ
    Chalmers, BA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2005, 35 (05): : 603 - 616
  • [7] Cornelissen M., 2012, THEORETICAL ISSUES E, P1
  • [8] A structured approach to the strategies analysis phase of cognitive work analysis
    Cornelissen, Miranda
    Salmon, Paul M.
    Jenkins, Daniel P.
    Lenne, Michael G.
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2013, 14 (06) : 546 - 564
  • [9] Validating the Strategies Analysis Diagram: Assessing the reliability and validity of a formative method
    Cornelissen, Miranda
    McClure, Roderick
    Salmon, Paul M.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (06) : 1484 - 1494
  • [10] Using cognitive work analysis and the strategies analysis diagram to understand variability in road user behaviour at intersections
    Cornelissen, Miranda
    Salmon, Paul M.
    McClure, Roderick
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2013, 56 (05) : 764 - 780