Cross-linguistic evidence for cognitive universals in the noun phrase

被引:10
作者
Martin, Alexander [1 ]
Ratitamkul, Theeraporn [2 ]
Abels, Klaus [3 ]
Adger, David [4 ]
Culbertson, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Language Evolut, 3 Charles St, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Dept Linguist, Pathumwan, Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, Chandler House,2 Wakefield St, London WC1N 1PF, England
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Language Linguist & Film, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
来源
LINGUISTICS VANGUARD | 2019年 / 5卷 / 01期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
syntax; typology; artificial language learning; universals; word order; noun phrase; ORDER;
D O I
10.1515/lingvan-2018-0072
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Noun phrase word order varies cross-linguistically, however, two distributional asymmetries have attracted substantial attention. First, the most common orders place adjectives closest to the noun, then numerals, then demonstratives (e.g., N-Adj-Num-Dem). Second, exceptions to this are restricted to post-nominal position (e.g., N-Dem-Num-Adj, but not, for instance, Adj-Num-Dem-N). These observations have been argued to reflect constraints on cognition. Here we report on two experiments, providing support for this claim. We taught English- and Thai-speaking participants artificial languages in which the position of modifiers relative to the noun differed from their native order (post-nominal position in English, pre-nominal in Thai). We trained participants on single-modifier phrases, and asked them to extrapolate to multiple modifier phrases. We found that both populations infer relative orders of modifiers that conform to the tendency for closest proximity of adjectives, then numerals, then demonstratives. Further, we show that Thai participants, learning pre-nominal modifiers, exhibit a stronger such preference. These results track the typology closely and are consistent with the claim that noun phrase word order reflects properties of human cognition. We discuss future research needed to rule out alternative explanations for our findings, including prior language experience.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[22]   Periphery Diachronic and cross-linguistic approaches INTRODUCTION [J].
Onodera, Noriko ;
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs .
JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL PRAGMATICS, 2017, 17 (02) :163-177
[23]   A cross-linguistic study of lexical and derived antonymy [J].
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria ;
Miestamo, Matti ;
Borstell, Carl .
LINGUISTICS, 2024, 62 (06) :1417-1472
[24]   VoxCommunis: A Corpus for Cross-linguistic Phonetic Analysis [J].
Ahn, Emily P. ;
Chodroff, Eleanor .
LREC 2022: THIRTEEN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2022, :5286-5294
[25]   Partitioning the timeline A cross-linguistic survey of tense [J].
Velupillai, Viveka .
STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, 2016, 40 (01) :93-136
[26]   Degree achievements and maximalization: a cross-linguistic perspective [J].
Vera, Gabriel Martinez .
GLOSSA-A JOURNAL OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS, 2021, 6 (01) :1-28
[27]   A cross-linguistic study of emphatic negative coordination [J].
Salaberri, Iker .
STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, 2022, 46 (03) :647-717
[28]   LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION IN CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE [J].
BAVIN, EL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 1995, 24 :373-396
[29]   Measure words, plurality, and cross-linguistic variation [J].
Mathieu, Eric ;
Zareikar, Gita .
LINGUISTIC VARIATION, 2015, 15 (02) :169-200
[30]   Syntactic position constrains cross-linguistic activation [J].
Marull, Crystal H. .
LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2015, 5 (02) :153-179