Cross-linguistic evidence for cognitive universals in the noun phrase

被引:10
|
作者
Martin, Alexander [1 ]
Ratitamkul, Theeraporn [2 ]
Abels, Klaus [3 ]
Adger, David [4 ]
Culbertson, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Language Evolut, 3 Charles St, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Dept Linguist, Pathumwan, Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, Chandler House,2 Wakefield St, London WC1N 1PF, England
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Language Linguist & Film, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
来源
LINGUISTICS VANGUARD | 2019年 / 5卷 / 01期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
syntax; typology; artificial language learning; universals; word order; noun phrase; ORDER;
D O I
10.1515/lingvan-2018-0072
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Noun phrase word order varies cross-linguistically, however, two distributional asymmetries have attracted substantial attention. First, the most common orders place adjectives closest to the noun, then numerals, then demonstratives (e.g., N-Adj-Num-Dem). Second, exceptions to this are restricted to post-nominal position (e.g., N-Dem-Num-Adj, but not, for instance, Adj-Num-Dem-N). These observations have been argued to reflect constraints on cognition. Here we report on two experiments, providing support for this claim. We taught English- and Thai-speaking participants artificial languages in which the position of modifiers relative to the noun differed from their native order (post-nominal position in English, pre-nominal in Thai). We trained participants on single-modifier phrases, and asked them to extrapolate to multiple modifier phrases. We found that both populations infer relative orders of modifiers that conform to the tendency for closest proximity of adjectives, then numerals, then demonstratives. Further, we show that Thai participants, learning pre-nominal modifiers, exhibit a stronger such preference. These results track the typology closely and are consistent with the claim that noun phrase word order reflects properties of human cognition. We discuss future research needed to rule out alternative explanations for our findings, including prior language experience.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CROSS-LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE FOR NUMBER PHRASE
    RITTER, E
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LINGUISTIQUE, 1992, 37 (02): : 197 - 218
  • [2] Noun phrase production by agrammatic patients: A cross-linguistic approach
    Ahlsen, E
    Nespoulous, JL
    Dordain, M
    Stark, J
    Jarema, G
    Kadzielawa, D
    Obler, LK
    Fitzpatrick, PM
    APHASIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (06) : 543 - 559
  • [3] Agent noun polysemy in a cross-linguistic perspective
    Luschuetzky, Hans Christian
    Rainer, Franz
    STUF-LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY AND UNIVERSALS, 2011, 64 (04) : 287 - 338
  • [5] A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and Mandarin
    Gelman, SA
    Tardif, T
    COGNITION, 1998, 66 (03) : 215 - 248
  • [7] The production of noun phrases: A cross-linguistic comparison of French and German
    Schriefers, H
    Teruel, E
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY FIRST ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1999, : 637 - 642
  • [8] Toward universals in the gestural organization of syllables: A cross-linguistic study of liquids
    Gick, B
    Campbell, F
    Oh, S
    Tamburri-Watt, L
    JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2006, 34 (01) : 49 - 72
  • [9] PRAGMATICS IN APHASIA - CROSS-LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE
    WULFECK, B
    BATES, E
    JUAREZ, L
    OPIE, M
    FRIEDERICI, A
    MACWHINNEY, B
    ZURIF, E
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1989, 32 : 315 - 336
  • [10] Prosody and animacy in the development of noun determiner use: A cross-linguistic approach
    Bassano, Dominique
    Korecky-Kroell, Katharina
    Maillochon, Isabelle
    van Dijk, Marijn
    Laaha, Sabine
    van Geert, Paul
    Dressler, Wolfgang U.
    FIRST LANGUAGE, 2013, 33 (05) : 476 - 503