The impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings

被引:0
作者
Fattah, Nadia Mohamed Ahmed Abdel [1 ]
Zahran, Mohamed H. [2 ]
Fawzy, Rawya K. [1 ]
Hamid, Alaa El Din M. Abdel [2 ]
Maghraby, Hala K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Radiodiag, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Breast cancer; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; mammography; BIRADS; ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1080/20905068.2021.1916244
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Mammography is the most used breast screening tool and was proven to reduce breast-cancer-associated mortality. The estimated sensitivity of mammography varies between 77% and 95%; however, sensitivity could be 26% lower in dense breasts than in entirely fatty breasts. The ability to represent the complex 3D breast architecture and early changes in anatomical structures in a 2D view is the biggest challenge for mammography. In Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), tomographic images are reconstructed from multiple projections acquired from different angles. This technique allows the generation of 3D data, reduction of tissue overlap and allows better evaluation of masses, architectural distortion, and asymmetries compared with conventional two-dimensional mammographic images. Objective: To evaluate the impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings. Methods: Prospective cohort for 180 women with mammographic non-mass findings who presented to Alexandria University Radio diagnosis Department either for screening or diagnostic purposes between July 2019 and August 2020 with mean age 51.44 +/- 10.67 . Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound was done for all patients. Lesions were evaluated on DM; DBT alone then combined DBT & DM. Comparison of results according to changes in BIRADS, diagnostic performance using histopathology as gold standard. Results: 208 non-mass findings were detected by conventional mammography (104 asymmetry, 35 architectural distortion, 69 micro calcifications), Tomosynthesis reduced the BIRADS 3 count by 32%, upgraded the count of BIRADS 4 lesions by 11.4% while upgraded the BIRADS 2 by 18.9% with consequent improvement of sensitivity and specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy to 96%, 95%, 94%,97%, and 95.6%. Conclusion: Combined FFDM and DBT improved the diagnostic performance in evaluation of non-mass findings and proper BIRADS categorization.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Barufaldi, Bruno ;
Acciavatti, Raymond J. ;
Conant, Emily F. ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) :193-203
[22]   Screening the Implant-Augmented Breast with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Is Tomosynthesis Necessary for Non-implant-Displaced Views? [J].
Nguyen, Derek L. ;
Grimm, Lars J. ;
Nelson, Jeffrey S. ;
Johnson, Karen S. ;
Ghate, Sujata, V .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024, 6 (03) :261-270
[23]   Texture in digital breast tomosynthesis: A comparison between mammographic and tomographic characterization of parenchymal properties [J].
Kontos, Despina ;
Bakic, Predrag R. ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915
[24]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Findings after Surgical Lipomodeling in a Breast Cancer Survivor [J].
Daye, Dania ;
Conant, Emily .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2014, 8 (09) :9-15
[25]   Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of non-mass enhancement of the breast [J].
Kazunori Kubota ;
Mio Mori ;
Tomoyuki Fujioka ;
Kaoru Watanabe ;
Yuko Ito .
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2023, 50 :361-366
[26]   Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis [J].
Cohen, Ethan O. ;
Tso, Hilda H. ;
Phalak, Kanchan A. ;
Mayo, Ray C. ;
Leung, Jessica W. T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (02) :445-451
[27]   Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of full field digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis using BIRADS score in a tertiary cancer care hospital [J].
Singla, Divya ;
Chaturvedi, Arvind K. ;
Aggarwal, Abhinav ;
Rao, S. A. ;
Hazarika, Dibyamohan ;
Mahawar, Vivek .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2018, 28 (01) :115-122
[28]   Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of non-mass enhancement of the breast [J].
Kubota, Kazunori ;
Mori, Mio ;
Fujioka, Tomoyuki ;
Watanabe, Kaoru ;
Ito, Yuko .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2023, 50 (03) :361-366
[29]   Impact of Obtaining a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Spot Compression View on Assessment of Equivocal DBT Findings [J].
Deleau, Florian ;
Linck, Pierre-Antoine ;
Brouste, Veronique ;
Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle ;
Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ;
Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ;
Chamming's, Foucauld .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (01) :37-45
[30]   Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis [J].
Gastounioti, Aimilia ;
McCarthy, Anne Marie ;
Pantalone, Lauren ;
Synnestvedt, Marie ;
Kontos, Despina ;
Conant, Emily F. .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) :319-326