Should cigarette pack sizes be capped?

被引:15
作者
Blackwell, Anna K. M. [1 ]
Lee, Ilse [2 ]
Scollo, Michelle [3 ]
Wakefield, Melanie [3 ]
Munafo, Marcus R. [1 ]
Marteau, Theresa M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, UK Ctr Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Sch Psychol Sci, 12a Priory Rd, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Behav & Hlth Res Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Ctr Behav Res Canc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Cigarette pack size; choice architecture; policy; portion size; public health; tobacco control; TOBACCO PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS; SMOKING-CESSATION; REDUCTION; SMOKERS; CONSUMPTION; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY; SUCCESS; QUIT;
D O I
10.1111/add.14770
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Very few countries regulate maximum cigarette pack size. Larger, non-standard sizes are increasingly being introduced by the tobacco industry. Larger portion sizes increase food consumption; larger cigarette packs may similarly increase tobacco consumption. Here we consider the evidence for legislation to cap cigarette pack size to reduce tobacco-related harm. Aims and analysis We first describe the regulations regarding minimum and maximum pack sizes in the 12 countries that have adopted plain packaging legislation and describe the range of sizes available. We then discuss evidence for two key assumptions that would support capping pack size. First, regarding the causal nature of the relationship between pack size and tobacco consumption, observational evidence suggests that people smoke fewer cigarettes when using smaller packs. Secondly, regarding the causal nature of the relationship between reducing consumption and successful cessation, reductions in number of cigarettes smoked per day are associated with increased cessation attempts and subsequent abstinence. However, more experimental evidence is needed to infer the causal nature of these associations among general populations of smokers. Conclusion Cigarette pack size is positively associated with consumption and consumption is negatively associated with cessation. Based on limited evidence of the causal nature of these associations, we hypothesize that government regulations to cap cigarette pack sizes would positively contribute to reducing smoking prevalence.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 809
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Press Release
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HLTH CONS SMOK REP S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Nicotine without smoke: Tobacco harm reduction
[4]   Do smoking reduction interventions promote cessation in smokers not ready to quit? [J].
Asfar, Taghrid ;
Ebbert, Jon O. ;
Klesges, Robert C. ;
Relyea, George E. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2011, 36 (07) :764-768
[5]   Does reduced smoking if you can't stop make any difference? [J].
Begh, Rachna ;
Lindson-Hawley, Nicola ;
Aveyard, Paul .
BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
[6]   The reliability and predictive validity of the Heaviness of Smoking Index and its two components: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country study [J].
Borland, R. ;
Yong, H. -H. ;
O'Connor, R. J. ;
Hyland, A. ;
Thompson, M. E. .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2010, 12 :S45-S50
[7]  
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, 2018, GLOB ISS PLAIN PACK
[8]   'A pack a day for 20 years': smoking and cigarette pack sizes [J].
Farrell, Lisa ;
Fry, Tim R. L. ;
Harris, Mark N. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (21) :2833-2842
[9]   Long-Term Results of a Smoking Reduction Program [J].
Glasgow, Russell E. ;
Gaglio, Bridget ;
Estabrooks, Paul A. ;
Marcus, Alfred C. ;
Ritzwoller, Debra P. ;
Smith, Tammy L. ;
Levinson, Arnold H. ;
Sukhanova, Anna ;
O'Donnell, Colin ;
Ferro, Erica F. ;
France, Eric K. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (01) :115-120
[10]  
Greenhalgh E., 2016, Tobacco in Australia: facts and issues