Setting surface wipe limits for skin sensitizers

被引:6
作者
Naumann, Bruce D. [1 ]
Arnold, Susan F. [2 ]
机构
[1] BD NAUMANN LLC, 11 Quail Ridge Dr, Flemington, NJ 08822 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Environm Sci, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Exposure assessment; hazard identification; OEBs; risk assessment; sensitization potency; LYMPH-NODE ASSAY; QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT; CONTACT ALLERGENS; GUINEA-PIG; UNCERTAINTY FACTORS; SCIENTIFIC BASIS; POTENCY; EXPOSURE; IDENTIFICATION; HYPERSENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1177/0748233719875365
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Guidance for managing potential dermal exposures has historically been qualitative in nature, for example, in the form of a DSEN notation. We propose a method that can provide quantitative guidance on how to establish and use surface wipe limits for skin sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a validated test that not only identifies potential skin sensitizers but also provides an effective concentration (EC3) value. This provides quantitative dose-response information on induction of skin sensitization that permits estimates of sensitization thresholds and potency. Building upon the previously established correlation between LLNA EC3 values and human repeat insult patch testing no-effect levels, we present a quantitative method for setting surface wipe guidelines using the LLNA EC3. These limits can be used to assign compounds to occupational exposure bands and provide handling guidance for skin sensitizers of varying potency, supporting both exposure assessment and control strategies. A table is included that suggests a band of reasonable surface wipe limits (mg/100 cm(2)) for potentially all chemical sensitizers. When used in conjunction with a comprehensive industrial hygiene program that includes hazard communication, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment, skin exposure and consequent skin sensitization risks in the workplace can be minimized.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 625
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Irritancy and Allergic Responses Induced by Topical Application of ortho-Phthalaldehyde [J].
Anderson, Stacey E. ;
Umbright, Christina ;
Sellamuthu, Rajendran ;
Fluharty, Kara ;
Kashon, Michael ;
Franko, Jennifer ;
Jackson, Laurel G. ;
Johnson, Victor J. ;
Joseph, Pius .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 115 (02) :435-443
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, TLVS BEIS BASED DOCU
[3]  
[Anonymous], ALT LAB ANIMALS
[4]   Correlation between experimental human and murine skin sensitization induction thresholds [J].
Api, Anne Marie ;
Basketter, David ;
Lalko, Jon .
CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 34 (04) :298-302
[5]   Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients [J].
Api, Anne Marie ;
Basketter, David A. ;
Cadby, Peter A. ;
Cano, Marie-France ;
Ellis, Graham ;
Gerberick, G. Frank ;
Griem, Peter ;
McNamee, Pauline M. ;
Ryan, Cindy A. ;
Safford, Robert .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 52 (01) :3-23
[6]   Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Clapp, C ;
Jefferies, D ;
Safford, B ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, F ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 53 (05) :260-267
[7]   COMPARISON OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH THE GUINEA-PIG MAXIMIZATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF A RANGE OF CONTACT ALLERGENS [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :65-69
[8]   Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Wright, ZM ;
Warbrick, EV ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
White, IR .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 45 (02) :89-94
[9]   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH CHEMICALS IDENTIFIED AS CONTACT ALLERGENS IN THE HUMAN MAXIMIZATION TEST [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
KIMBER, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (06) :543-547
[10]   Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment: A review of underlying assumptions [J].
Basketter, David ;
Safford, Bob .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 74 :105-116