Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program

被引:31
作者
Théberge, I
Hébert-Croteau, N
Langlois, A
Major, D
Brisson, J
机构
[1] Inst Natl Sante Publ Quebec, Direct Syst Soins & Serv, Ste Foy, PQ G1V 5B3, Canada
[2] Hop Charles LeMoyne, Ctr Rech, Greenfield Pk, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec, Ctr Hosp Affilie, Hop St Sacrement, Unite Rech Sante Populat, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.1040485
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program ( Programme quebecois de depistage du cancer du sein [PQDCS]), radiologists' and facilities' volumes of screening mammography vary considerably. We examined the relation of screening-mammography volume to rates of breast cancer detection and false-positive readings in the PQDCS. Methods: The study population included 307 314 asymptomatic women aged 50 - 69 years screened during 1998 - 2000. Breast cancer detection rates were analyzed by comparing all women with screening-detected breast cancer ( n = 1709) and a 10% random sample of those without ( n = 30 560). False-positive rates were analyzed by comparing the 3159 women with false-positive readings and the 27 401 others in the 10% random sample. Characteristics of participants, radiologists and facilities were obtained from the PQDCS information system. Data were analyzed by means of logistic regression. Results: The rate of breast cancer detection appeared to be unrelated to the radiologist's screening-mammography volume but increased with the facility's screening-mammography volume. The breast cancer detection rate ratio for facilities performing 4000 or more screenings per year, compared with those performing fewer than 2000, was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 - 1.52). In contrast, the frequency of false-positive readings was unrelated to the facility's screening volume but was inversely related to the radiologist's screening volume: the rate ratio for readers of 1500 or more screenings per year compared with those reading fewer than 250 was 0.53 ( 95% CI 0.35 - 0.79). Interpretation: Radiologists' and facilities' caseloads showed independent and complementary associations with performance of screening mammography in the PQDCS. Radiologists who worked in larger facilities and read more screening mammograms had higher breast cancer detection rates while maintaining lower false-positive rates.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 199
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*ASS CAN RAD, 2000, PROGR AGR MAMM, P5
[2]   Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation [J].
Beam, CA ;
Conant, EF ;
Sickles, EA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (04) :282-290
[3]   Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Stukel, TA ;
Siewers, AE ;
Goodney, PP ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Lucas, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) :2117-2127
[4]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[5]   Does individual programme size affect screening performance? Results from the United Kingdom NHS breast screening programme [J].
Blanks, RG ;
Bennett, RL ;
Wallis, MG ;
Moss, SM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (01) :11-14
[6]   Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Ambrogetti, D ;
Catarzi, S ;
Morrone, D ;
Del Turco, MR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1999, 6 (03) :149-151
[7]  
*COLL MED QUEB, 1998, ANN MED 1999 2000
[8]  
CORNFIELD J, 1951, J NATL CANCER I, V11, P1269
[9]   Multilevel analysis in public health research [J].
Diez-Roux, AV .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 21 :171-192
[10]   Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography? Part II [J].
Elmore, JG ;
Miglioretti, DL ;
Carney, PA .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (04) :250-252