Robot-assisted vesicovaginal fistula repair: a safe and feasible technique

被引:29
作者
Bora, Girdhar S. [1 ]
Singh, Shivanshu [1 ]
Mavuduru, Ravimohan S. [1 ]
Devana, Sudheer K. [1 ]
Kumar, Santosh [1 ]
Mete, Uttam K. [1 ]
Singh, Shrawan K. [1 ]
Mandal, Arup K. [1 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER, Dept Urol, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
Robotic surgery; Vesicovaginal fistula; Case series; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-016-3194-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Open transabdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) requires a long cystotomy incision, suprapubic drainage and delayed recovery. Laparoscopic repair is limited by difficult suturing in pelvic procedures. Therefore, the utility of robotic assistance is being increasingly explored. We share our initial experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic VVF repair. The data from patients who underwent robot-assisted VVF repair from December 2014 to August 2016 were recorded and analyzed. Patients underwent standard preoperative evaluation. After cystovaginoscopy and placement of an access catheter across the fistula, a four-port transperitoneal approach was used. Following adhesiolysis, limited posterior cystotomy was performed. The vaginal and bladder flaps were separated and repaired in the transverse and vertical directions, respectively. V-Loc sutures were used for bladder closure. Omental/sigmoid colon epiploicae or a peritoneal flap was interposed. A pelvic drain was placed. During the study period, 30 patients underwent surgery, of whom 11 (36.7 %) had complex VVF (9 with failure of a previous repair, 1 following radiotherapy, and 1 with a large defect following obstructed labor), and 27 had supratrigonal VVF. The mean age of the patients was 43.5 +/- 8.6 years. The mean operative time was 133 +/- 48 min. Median blood loss was 50 ml (IQR 50 ml). No suprapubic catheter was placed. The median durations of drain placement and hospital stay were 3 days (IQR 2 days) and 7.5 days (IQR 4.5 days), respectively. The median duration of follow up was 38 weeks (IQR 46 weeks). No recurrence was seen in 28 patients (93.3 %). Current data suggest that robot-assisted VVF repair is safe and feasible and probides the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 962
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Agrawal V, 2015, UROLOGY, V86, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.074
[2]   Scratch to state-of-the-art: setting up a new robotic facility in a developing country [J].
Bora, G. S. ;
Mavuduru, R. S. ;
Devana, S. K. ;
Singh, S. K. ;
Mandal, A. K. .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2018, 12 (01) :193-195
[3]   Comparative Analysis of Outcome Between Open and Robotic Surgical Repair of Recurrent Supra-Trigonal Vesico-Vaginal Fistula [J].
Gupta, Narmada P. ;
Mishra, Saurabh ;
Hemal, Ashok K. ;
Mishra, Archana ;
Seth, Amlesh ;
Dogra, Prem N. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (11) :1779-1782
[4]   Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of High Vesicovaginal Fistulae With Peritoneal Flap Inlay [J].
Kurz, Michael ;
Horstmann, Marcus ;
John, Hubert .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (01) :229-230
[5]   Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction [J].
Melamud, O ;
Eichel, L ;
Turbow, B ;
Shanberg, A .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (01) :163-166
[6]   Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Miklos, John R. ;
Moore, Robert D. ;
Chinthakanan, Orawee .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) :727-736
[7]   Laparoscopic extravesical vesicovaginal fistula repair: our technique and 15-year experience [J].
Miklos, John R. ;
Moore, Robert D. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (03) :441-446
[8]   Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistulae with the transperitoneal-transvaginal approach: A case series [J].
Nunez Bragayrac, Luciano A. ;
Azhar, Raed A. ;
Fernandez, Golena ;
Cabrera, Marino ;
Saenz, Eric ;
Machuca, Victor ;
de Andrade, Robert ;
Carmona, Oswaldo ;
Sotelo, Rene .
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2014, 40 (06) :810-815
[9]  
OCONOR VJ, 1951, J UROLOGY, V66, P579, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)74381-9
[10]  
Pietersma Carsten S, 2014, BMJ Case Rep, V2014, DOI 10.1136/bcr-2014-204119