The development and validation of a scale measuring teacher autonomous behaviour

被引:17
作者
Evers, Arnoud T. [1 ]
Verboon, Peter [1 ]
Klaeijsen, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Expertise Vocat Educ & Training Ecbo, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
关键词
teacher autonomous behaviour; validation study; confirmatory factor analysis; cross-validation; BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOL TEACHERS; CHARTER SCHOOLS; WORK; LEADERSHIP; EDUCATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; CONSEQUENCES; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/berj.3291
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the current study a multi-dimensional scale that measures teacher autonomous behaviour is presented. The scale is applicable across the following educational sectors: primary education, secondary education and vocational education. Based on an elaborate literature study, four theoretically relevant dimensions of teacher autonomous behaviour were derived. Psychometric characteristics of the instrument (note that the terms scale' and instrument' are used interchangeably in this article) were tested among a sample of Dutch teachers working in primary, secondary and vocational education (N = 1111). The validity of our instrument was tested in several ways. First, by performing confirmatory factor analysis, we tested the factorial structure, which confirmed the hypothesised four dimensions: (1) primary work processes in the class; (2) curriculum implementation; (3) participation in decision making at school; (4) professional development. Thereafter, we calculated the scale's reliability, which appeared to be excellent. In addition, we tested for measurement invariance by cross-validating the study in the educational sectors mentioned above. Also, the convergent, divergent and predictive validity was investigated. Teacher autonomy appeared to predict workplace learning, more specifically experimenting, reflecting and school development. Finally, we investigated whether transformational leadership can facilitate teacher autonomy, which appeared to be the case. The results empirically confirm the four dimensions of teacher autonomous behaviour, which we derived from theory, and offer solid proof of the psychometric properties of our instrument. The instrument can be used by school leaders and policy makers to monitor autonomous behaviour. More generally, the development and use of this instrument helps us understand teacher autonomous behaviour and teacher professionalism.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 821
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EDUC RES QUART
[2]   EDUCATION POLICY AND TEACHER EFFORT [J].
BALLOU, D ;
PODGURSKY, M .
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1995, 34 (01) :21-39
[3]   Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching [J].
Benson, Phil .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2010, 14 (03) :259-275
[4]  
Browne MW., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[5]   Autonomy through pedagogical research [J].
Castle, Kathryn .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2006, 22 (08) :1094-1103
[6]   Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures [J].
Chen, Beiwen ;
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Beyers, Wim ;
Boone, Liesbet ;
Deci, Edward L. ;
Van der Kaap-Deeder, Jolene ;
Duriez, Bart ;
Lens, Willy ;
Matos, Lennia ;
Mouratidis, Athanasios ;
Ryan, Richard M. ;
Sheldon, Kennon M. ;
Soenens, Bart ;
Van Petegem, Stijn ;
Verstuyf, Joke .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2015, 39 (02) :216-236
[7]   Academic identities under threat? [J].
Clegg, Sue .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2008, 34 (03) :329-345
[8]   Teacher autonomy and accountability in charter schools [J].
Crawford, JR .
EDUCATION AND URBAN SOCIETY, 2001, 33 (02) :186-200
[9]   The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior [J].
Deci, EL ;
Ryan, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2000, 11 (04) :227-268
[10]  
Dee J.R., 2002, Educational Research Quarterly, V25, P36