Framing Climate Change: Exploring the Role of Emotion in Generating Advocacy Behavior

被引:277
作者
Nabi, Robin L. [1 ]
Gustafson, Abel [2 ]
Jensen, Risa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Commun, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Commun, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
emotion; framing; hope; climate change; persuasion; LOSS-FRAMED MESSAGES; PSYCHOLOGICAL REACTANCE; DISCRETE EMOTIONS; RELATIVE PERSUASIVENESS; PROSPECT-THEORY; FEAR; COMMUNICATION; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; APPEALS;
D O I
10.1177/1075547018776019
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Substantial research examines the cognitive factors underlying proenviron-mental message effectiveness. In contrast, this study investigates the role of emotion, fear and hope specifically, in the gain/loss framing of environmental policy initiatives. The 2 (threat vs. no threat) x 2 (gain- vs. loss-framed efficacy) experiment revealed emotion, especially hope, as a key mediator between gain-framed messages and desired climate change policy attitudes and advocacy. Results further supported the value of sequencing emotional experiences to enhance persuasive effect. This research offers an inaugural test of emotional flow theorizing and highlights the need for additional research on emotional processes in environmental communication.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 468
页数:27
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Bain PG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P154, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2814, 10.1038/nclimate2814]
[2]   What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda [J].
Bauer, Martin W. ;
Allum, Nick ;
Miller, Steve .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (01) :79-95
[3]   Effects of Goal Framing and Emotions on Perceived Threat and Willingness to Sacrifice for Climate Change [J].
Bilandzic, Helena ;
Kalch, Anja ;
Soentgen, Jens .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2017, 39 (04) :466-491
[4]   Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade's Literature [J].
Borah, Porismita .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2011, 61 (02) :246-263
[5]   The End of Framing as we Know it . . . and the Future of Media Effects [J].
Cacciatore, Michael A. ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Iyengar, Shanto .
MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY, 2016, 19 (01) :7-23
[6]   Toward a Theory of Persuasive Hope: Effects of Cognitive Appraisals, Hope Appeals, and Hope in the Context of Climate Change [J].
Chadwick, Amy E. .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2015, 30 (06) :598-611
[7]   Gain- and Loss-Frame Sun Safety Messages and Psychological Reactance of Adolescents [J].
Cho, Hyunyi ;
Sands, Laura .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2011, 28 (04) :308-317
[8]   Green Narratives: How Affective Responses to Media Messages Influence Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences About Environmental Hazards [J].
Cooper, Kathryn E. ;
Nisbet, Erik C. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2016, 38 (05) :626-654
[10]   Perceptions of Manipulation and Judgments of Illegitimacy: Pitfalls in the Use of Emphasis Framing when Communicating about CO2 Capture and Storage [J].
de Vries, Gerdien ;
Terwel, Bart W. ;
Ellemers, Naomi .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2016, 10 (02) :206-226