Tissue Stability of Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets: A 5-Year Prospective Single-Cohort Study

被引:31
作者
Covani, Ugo [1 ,2 ]
Canullo, Luigi [2 ]
Toti, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Alfonsi, Fortunato [2 ]
Barone, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Surg Med Mol & Crit Area Pathol, I-55041 Camaiore, Italy
[2] Versilia Gen Hosp, Tuscan Stomatol Inst, Lido Di Camaiore, Italy
关键词
Alveolar bone grafting; alveolar bone loss; dental implants; single-tooth; gingival recession; materials; biocompatible; tooth extraction; RIDGE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES; TOOTH IMPLANTS; CASE-SERIES; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; FOLLOW-UP; IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT; CLINICAL-TRIAL; AESTHETIC ZONE; HARD; SOFT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2014.140175
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Several materials have been used for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. This 5-year prospective single-cohort study is aimed at evaluating the success rate, marginal bone level (MBL), soft tissue stability, and subjective patient evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets with the use of a flapless technique and a xenograft to treat the peri-implant bone defect. Methods: Patients requiring a single implant in fresh extraction sockets were selected. After flapless extraction and implant insertion, the peri-implant bone defect was grafted with porcine bone. Collagen membrane was used to stabilize the graft. Four months later, a second surgery and prosthetic procedures were performed. Clinical parameters (width of keratinized gingiva [WKG], facial soft tissue level [FST], papilla index, plaque index, and bleeding on probing) were measured, and periapical radiographs were taken at the time of implant placement (baseline) and then at 1, 3, and 5 years thereafter. Image analysis software was applied to measure changes in the marginal bone level (Delta MBL). Additionally, patient satisfaction regarding the implant treatment was evaluated. All analyses were collected and measured by an independent, trained observer. Together with descriptive statistics, for each of the outcome variables, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched samples. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.01 for all analyses. Results: Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated, with an implant survival rate at 5 years of 95.7%. Delta MBL showed statistically significant differences: mean values were -0.68 +/- 0.39, -0.94 +/- 0.44, and -1.08 +/- 0.43 mm at the 1, 3, and 5-year follow-up, respectively. Changes in WKG (Delta WKG) and FST (Delta FST) decreased from the 1-year point of the survey (0.80 +/- 0.79 and 0.71 +/- 0.73 mm for Delta WKG and Delta FST, respectively) to the last follow-up check at 5 years (0.67 +/- 0.74 and 0.56 +/- 0.69 mm for Delta WKG and Delta FST, respectively), with no significant differences. The papilla indexes showed significant differences among the baseline and all the other time points. Concerning patient satisfaction, at the last survey time point, 74% +/- 11.8% of patients were satisfied regarding the overall implant treatment, 73.0% +/- 11.1% gave a favorable opinion regarding the appearance of the peri-implant soft tissues, and 80.5% +/- 11.3% judged positively the finished appearance of the implant crown. No significant differences were obtained among the three follow-up times. Conclusions: The data of the present study suggest that the placement of a dental implant by means of a flapless technique in a fresh extraction socket filled with slowly resorbable graft biomaterial and with a delayed prosthetic restoration shows positive final esthetic outcomes. At the 5-year point of the survey, the changes in the bone level were minimal. Moreover, both midfacial tissue and the papillae maintained the early increase recorded before the first year of the follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:E323 / E332
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] ASHMAN A, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P28
  • [2] Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction
    Barone, Antonio
    Rispoli, Lorena
    Vozza, Iole
    Quaranta, Alessandro
    Covani, Ugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (11) : 1914 - 1920
  • [3] The Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Versus Delayed Restoration Procedures on Immediate Implants: A Comparative Cohort Study for Single-Tooth Replacement
    Barone, Antonio
    Toti, Paolo
    Quaranta, Alessandro
    Derchi, Giacomo
    Covani, Ugo
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (06) : 1114 - 1126
  • [4] Extraction Socket Healing in Humans After Ridge Preservation Techniques: Comparison Between Flapless and Flapped Procedures in a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Barone, Antonio
    Toti, Paolo
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Derchi, Giacomo
    Covani, Ugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (01) : 14 - 23
  • [5] Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Renzi, Antonio
    Lindhe, Jan
    Berglundh, Tord
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (12) : 1226 - 1232
  • [6] Tissue integration of non-submerged implants 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants
    Buser, D.
    Weber, H-P
    Lang, N. P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1990, 1 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [7] Long-Term Stability of Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement Following Single Tooth Extraction in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study in 41 Patients With a 5- to 9-Year Follow-Up
    Buser, Daniel
    Chappuis, Vivianne
    Bornstein, Michael M.
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Frei, Marc
    Belser, Urs C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (11) : 1517 - 1527
  • [8] Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs
    Caneva, Marco
    Salata, Luiz Antonio
    de Souza, Sergio Scombatti
    Bressan, Eriberto
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (09) : 885 - 890
  • [9] Chen ST, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P163, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080243, 10.1902/jop.2009.080243 ]
  • [10] Cooper LF, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V25, P1222