Toward creating a fairer ranking in search engine results

被引:67
作者
Gao, Ruoyuan [1 ]
Shah, Chirag [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Informat Sch, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Information retrieval; Search engine bias; Fairness ranking; Relevance; Diversity; Novelty; BIAS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102138
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the increasing popularity and social influence of search engines in IR, various studies have raised concerns on the presence of bias in search engines and the social responsibilities of IR systems. As an essential component of search engine, ranking is a crucial mechanism in presenting the search results or recommending items in a fair fashion. In this article, we focus on the top-k diversity fairness ranking in terms of statistical parity fairness and disparate impact fairness. The former fairness definition provides a balanced overview of search results where the number of documents from different groups are equal; The latter enables a realistic overview where the proportion of documents from different groups reflect the overall proportion. Using 100 queries and top 100 results per query from Google as the data, we first demonstrate how topical diversity bias is present in the top web search results. Then, with our proposed entropy-based metrics for measuring the degree of bias, we reveal that the top search results are unbalanced and disproportionate to their overall diversity distribution. We explore several fairness ranking strategies to investigate the relationship between fairness, diversity, novelty and relevance. Our experimental results show that using a variant of fair epsilon-greedy strategy, we could bring more fairness and enhance diversity in search results without a cost of relevance. In fact, we can improve the relevance and diversity by introducing the diversity fairness. Additional experiments with TREC datasets containing 50 queries demonstrate the robustness of our proposed strategies and our findings on the impact of fairness. We present a series of correlation analysis on the amount of fairness and diversity, showing that statistical parity fairness highly correlates with diversity while disparate impact fairness does not. This provides clear and tangible implications for future works where one would want to balance fairness, diversity and relevance in search results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is this news article still relevant? Ranking by contemporary relevance in archival search
    Jatowt, Adam
    Sato, Mari
    Draxl, Simon
    Duan, Yijun
    Campos, Ricardo
    Yoshikawa, Masatoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, 2024, 25 (02) : 197 - 216
  • [42] Promoting Civil Discourse Through Search Engine Diversity
    Yom-Tov, Elad
    Dumais, Susan
    Guo, Qi
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2014, 32 (02) : 145 - 154
  • [43] UNFair: Search Engine Manipulation, Undetectable by Amortized Inequity
    de Jonge, Tim
    Hiemstra, Djoerd
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2023, 2023, : 830 - 839
  • [44] Search Engine Predilection towards News Media Providers
    Azzopardi, Leif
    Owens, Ciaran
    PROCEEDINGS 32ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2009, : 774 - 775
  • [45] Ranking of Wikipedia Articles in Search Engines Revisited: Fair Ranking for Reasonable Quality?
    Lewandowski, Dirk
    Spree, Ulrike
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (01): : 117 - 132
  • [46] Identifying Popular Search Goals behind Search Queries to Improve Web Search Ranking
    Wang Ting-Xuan
    Lu Wen-Hsiang
    INFORMATION RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 7097 : 250 - +
  • [47] Social Search Engine Research
    Cao, Jiandong
    Tang, Yang
    Lou, Binbin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCSIT 2010), VOL 7, 2010, : 308 - 309
  • [48] Web Search Engine Research
    Isfandyari-Moghaddam, Alireza
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (03) : 403 - 404
  • [49] SEFT: a search engine for text
    de Kretser, O
    Moffat, A
    SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2004, 34 (10) : 1011 - 1023
  • [50] Measuring search engine bias
    Mowshowitz, A
    Kawaguchi, A
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 41 (05) : 1193 - 1205