On damage detection of beam structures using multiple types of influence lines

被引:12
作者
Cai, Qin -Lin [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zhi-Wei [2 ]
Zhu, Songye [1 ]
Mo, Lu-Ye [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sensitivity analysis; Influence line; Damage detection; Bridge health monitoring; IDENTIFICATION; QUANTIFICATION; LOCALIZATION; BRIDGES; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.022
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Damage indices that are sensitive to early damage or abnormality of bridges are essential to take protective measures before any catastrophic failure of bridges occurs. Influence lines (ILs) have been proved as a promising bridge damage index numerically and experimentally. However, a comprehensive study on using various types of ILs for damage detection is still unavailable. This paper explicitly reveals the intrinsic relationships among various types of ILs, including deflection, rotation, bending stress, and shear stress ILs, and their corresponding first-and second-order finite differences with respect to moving force locations. Subsequently, the sensitivities and detectable ranges of various types of ILs are investigated and compared systematically through two representative examples, namely, a simply supported beam and a continuous beam. The sensor locations that correspond to high sensitivities and wide detectable ranges are identified for various types of ILs. The pros and cons of calculating the finite differences of ILs for damage detection are also illustrated with consideration of measurement noise. An experiment on a simply supported beam was conducted to partially validate the findings in this study. The conclusions of this study answer fundamental questions regarding the rational selections of IL types and sensor locations in IL-based damage detection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 465
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2018, MAN BRIDG EV
  • [2] Non-contact structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge: case study
    Alamdari, Mehrisadat Makki
    Ge, Linlin
    Kildashti, Kamyar
    Zhou, Yincai
    Harvey, Bruce
    Du, Zheyuan
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2019, 15 (08) : 1119 - 1136
  • [3] Damage diagnosis in bridge structures using rotation influence line: Validation on a cable-stayed bridge
    Alamdari, Mehrisadat Makki
    Kildashti, Kamyar
    Samali, Bijan
    Goudarzi, Hamid Valipour
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 185 : 1 - 14
  • [4] Damage Localization and Quantification from the Image of Changes in Flexibility
    Bernal, Dionisio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2014, 140 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [5] Damage localization and quantification for beam bridges based on frequency variation of parked vehicle-bridge systems
    Cao, Lei
    He, Wen-Yu
    Ren, Wei-Xin
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2021, 31 : 357 - 368
  • [6] Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices
    Catbas, FN
    Aktan, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (08) : 1026 - 1036
  • [7] LOCATION OF DEFECTS IN STRUCTURES FROM MEASUREMENTS OF NATURAL FREQUENCIES
    CAWLEY, P
    ADAMS, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN, 1979, 14 (02) : 49 - 57
  • [8] Stress Influence Line Identification of Long Suspension Bridges Installed with Structural Health Monitoring Systems
    Chen, Zhi Wei
    Cai, Qin Lin
    Li, Jun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2016, 16 (04)
  • [9] Damage quantification of beam structures using deflection influence line changes and sparse regularization
    Chen, Zhi-Wei
    Zhao, Long
    Zhang, Jian
    Cai, Qin-Lin
    Li, Jun
    Zhu, Songye
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (09) : 1997 - 2010
  • [10] Damage quantification of beam structures using deflection influence lines
    Chen, Zhi-Wei
    Cai, Qin-Lin
    Zhu, Songye
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2018, 25 (11)