Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters

被引:237
作者
Washabaugh, Edward P. [1 ,2 ]
Kalyanaraman, Tarun [1 ]
Adamczyk, Peter G. [3 ]
Claflin, Edward S. [1 ]
Krishnan, Chandramouli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Michigan Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Mech Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Inertial sensors; Biomechanics; Gait detection; Accuracy; Wearable; Wearable devices; SMALLEST REAL DIFFERENCE; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; TREADMILL WALKING; OVERGROUND WALKING; AMBULATORY SYSTEM; RELIABILITY; VARIABILITY; HEALTHY; SENSORS; STROKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.013
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are small wearable sensors that have tremendous potential to be applied to clinical gait analysis. They allow objective evaluation of gait and movement disorders outside the clinic and research laboratory, and permit evaluation on large numbers of steps. However, repeatability and validity data of these systems are sparse for gait metrics. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and between day repeatability of spatiotemporal metrics (gait speed, stance percent, swing percent, gait cycle time, stride length, cadence, and step duration) as measured with the APDM Opal IMUs and Mobility Lab system. We collected data on 39 healthy subjects. Subjects were tested over two days while walking on a standard treadmill, split-belt treadmill, or overground, with IMUs placed in two locations: both feet and both ankles. The spatiotemporal measurements taken with the IMU system were validated against data from an instrumented treadmill, or using standard clinical procedures. Repeatability and minimally detectable change (MDC) of the system was calculated between days. IMUs displayed high to moderate validity when measuring most of the gait metrics tested. Additionally, these measurements appear to be repeatable when used on the treadmill and overground. The foot configuration of the IMUs appeared to better measure gait parameters; however, both the foot and ankle configurations demonstrated good repeatability. In conclusion, the IMU system in this study appears to be both accurate and repeatable for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters in healthy young adults.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes [J].
Aminian, K ;
Najafi, B ;
Büla, C ;
Leyvraz, PF ;
Robert, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 35 (05) :689-699
[2]   Effects of Levodopa on Postural Strategies in Parkinson's disease [J].
Baston, Chiara ;
Mancini, Martina ;
Rocchi, Laura ;
Horak, Fay .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2016, 46 :26-29
[3]   Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness [J].
Beckerman, H ;
Roebroeck, ME ;
Lankhorst, GJ ;
Becher, JG ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Verbeek, ALM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :571-578
[4]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[5]   Reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis in patients with orthopedic impairments [J].
Brunnekreef, JJ ;
van Uden, CJT ;
van Moorsel, S ;
Kooloos, JGM .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2005, 6 (1)
[6]   Reliabilty, smallest real difference and concurrent validity of indices computed from GRF components in gait of stroke patients [J].
Campanini, I. ;
Merlo, A. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (02) :127-131
[7]  
Cicchetti DV., 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENTS, V6, P284, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
[8]   Evaluation of an inertial sensor system for analysis of timed-up-and-go under dual-task demands [J].
Coulthard, Jason T. ;
Treen, Tanner T. ;
Oates, Alison R. ;
Lanovaz, Joel L. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (04) :882-887
[9]   Levodopa Is a Double-Edged Sword for Balance and Gait in People With Parkinson's Disease [J].
Curtze, Carolin ;
Nutt, John G. ;
Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia ;
Mancini, Martina ;
Horak, Fay B. .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2015, 30 (10) :1361-1370
[10]   Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures - Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example [J].
de Vet, HCW ;
Bouter, LM ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Beurskens, AJHM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 17 (04) :479-487