A Pareto-optimal moving average multigene genetic programming model for daily streamflow prediction

被引:50
作者
Mehr, Ali Danandeh [1 ,2 ]
Kahya, Ercan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hydraul Div, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Near East Univ, Dept Civil Engn, POB 99138, TR-10 North Cyprus, Mersin, Turkey
关键词
Multigene genetic programming; Streamflow prediction; Pareto-optimal; Hydrological modelling; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; FLOW; ANN; RIVER; PRECIPITATION; COEFFICIENT; PERFORMANCE; BASIN; SWAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.045
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Genetic programming (GP) is able to systematically explore alternative model structures of different accuracy and complexity from observed input and output data. The effectiveness of GP in hydrological system identification has been recognized in recent studies. However, selecting a parsimonious (accurate and simple) model from such alternatives still remains a question. This paper proposes a Pareto-optimal moving average multigene genetic programming (MA-MGGP) approach to develop a parsimonious model for single-station streamflow prediction. The three main components of the approach that take us from observed data to a validated model are: (1) data pre-processing, (2) system identification and (3) system simplification. The data pre-processing ingredient uses a simple moving average filter to diminish the lagged prediction effect of stand-alone data-driven models. The multigene ingredient of the model tends to identify the underlying nonlinear system with expressions simpler than classical monolithic GP and, eventually simplification component exploits Pareto front plot to select a parsimonious model through an interactive complexity-efficiency trade-off. The approach was tested using the daily streamflow records from a station on Senoz Stream, Turkey. Comparing to the efficiency results of stand-alone GP, MGGP, and conventional multi linear regression prediction models as benchmarks, the proposed Pareto-optimal MA-MGGP model put forward a parsimonious solution, which has a noteworthy importance of being applied in practice. In addition, the approach allows the user to enter human insight into the problem to examine evolved models and pick the best performing programs out for further analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 615
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   A stepwise model to predict monthly streamflow [J].
Al-Juboori, Anas Mahmood ;
Guven, Aytac .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 543 :283-292
[2]  
Altunkaynak A., 2015, J HYDROL ENG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Genetic programming IV: routine human-competitive machine intelligence
[4]  
Babovic V., 2000, Journal of Hydroinformatics, V1, P35, DOI DOI 10.2166/HYDRO.2000.0004
[5]   Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks [J].
Besaw, Lance E. ;
Rizzo, Donna M. ;
Bierman, Paul R. ;
Hackett, William R. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 386 (1-4) :27-37
[6]   Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1 - background and methodology [J].
Bowden, GJ ;
Dandy, GC ;
Maier, HR .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 301 (1-4) :75-92
[7]  
Brameier Markus F., 2007, Linear genetic programming
[8]   Daily streamflow modelling using autoregressive moving average and artificial neural networks models: case study of Coruh basin, Turkey [J].
Can, Ibrahim ;
Tosunoglu, Fatih ;
Kahya, Ercan .
WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 26 (04) :567-576
[9]   Comparison between kinematic wave and artificial neural network models in event-based runoff simulation for an overland plane [J].
Chua, Lloyd H. C. ;
Wong, Tommy S. W. ;
Sriramula, L. K. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 357 (3-4) :337-348
[10]   Successive-station monthly streamflow prediction using different artificial neural network algorithms [J].
Danandeh Mehr, A. ;
Kahya, E. ;
Sahin, A. ;
Nazemosadat, M. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 12 (07) :2191-2200