When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review

被引：1
作者：
Rossdale, P. D.
机构：
来源：
EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL | 2010年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词：
QUALITY; AUTHORS; UNMASKING; EDITORS; TRIAL;
D O I：
10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00125.x
中图分类号：
S85 [动物医学（兽医学）];
学科分类号：
0906 ;
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码：283 / 283
页数：1
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals
    Baggs, Judith Gedney
    Broome, Marion E.
    Dougherty, Molly C.
    Freda, Margaret C.
    Kearney, Margaret H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 64 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [2] Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial
    Godlee, F
    Gale, CR
    Martyn, CN
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 237 - 240
  • [3] To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer
    Regehr, Glenn
    Bordage, Georges
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (09) : 832 - 839
  • [4] Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
    Schroter, S
    Tite, L
    Hutchings, A
    Black, N
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (03): : 314 - 317
  • [5] Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
    van Rooyen, S
    Godlee, F
    Evans, S
    Smith, R
    Black, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (10) : 622 - 624
  • [6] Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
    van Rooyen, S
    Godlee, F
    Evans, S
    Smith, R
    Black, N
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 234 - 237
  • [7] Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
    Wager, Elizabeth
    Parkin, Emma C.
    Tamber, Pritpal S.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2006, 4 (1)
1