The correction of asymmetry using computer planned distraction osteogenesis versus conventional planned extra-oral distraction osteogenesis: A randomized control clinical trial

被引:6
作者
El Hadidi, Yasser Nabil [1 ]
Hany, Hossam El Dien [1 ]
Taha, Moustafa [1 ]
Sleem, Heba [1 ]
El Kassaby, Marwa [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Dent, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION; HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; RECONSTRUCTION; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; ANKYLOSIS; MAXILLARY; ACCURACY; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2022.04.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of the use of computer-guided surgical templates in association with mandibular distraction osteogenesis to correct mandibular asymmetry. In the study group a simulation process was conducted to restore the exact position of the chin skeletally by planning the osteotomy orientation, distractor vector, pin positions, and distraction distance calculation. The Control group was treated with conventional distraction in which an oblique osteotomy was done, and distraction was performed until the midline coincided. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups, study and control. The study included (12) young patients; ten males participated and two females (average age 14 +/- 6 years) (Range = 6-23 years)). There was a statistically significant (P = 0.02) improvement in smile orientation in the study with 63.7% +/- 19% improvement compared to control, which had only 37% +/- 14%. There was a statistically significant (P = 0.02) improvement in ramus height in the study with 93% +/- 9% improvement compared to control, which had only 74% +/- 16%. There was a non-significant (P = 0.2) improvement in chin deviation in the study with 42% +/- 26% improvement compared to control, which had only 25% +/- 15%. The secondary outcome results showed that there was statistically significant (P = 0.0001) improvement in smile orientation post distraction 50% +/- 21%, there was statistically significant (P= P=0.002) improvement of ramus height post distraction osteogenesis 82% +/- 16%, and there was statistically significant (P = 0.0001) improvement in chin deviation 33% +/- 22% post distraction osteogenesis. Overall, the current research recommends the use of computer planned distraction instead of conventional planned distraction in order to achieve better symmetry. Distraction failed in correction of chin asymmetry; thus, the authors recommend performing genioplasty post distraction after the patient reaches puberty for more optimum results regarding the chin. (C) 2022 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 514
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A new device for microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis
    Ayoub, AF
    Richardson, W
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 39 (05) : 353 - 355
  • [2] Simulation-guided navigation for vector control in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Badiali, Giovanni
    Cutolo, Fabrizio
    Roncari, Andrea
    Marchetti, Claudio
    Bianchi, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (06) : 969 - 980
  • [3] Mandibular bi-directional distraction osteogenesis: A technique to manage both transverse and sagittal mandibular diameters via a lingual tooth-borne acrylic plate and double-hinge bone anchorage
    Carlino, F.
    Claudio, P. P.
    Tomeo, M.
    Cortese, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (10) : 1521 - 1529
  • [4] Early hemi-mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis contributes to compensatory maxillary growth
    Chen, Xiaojun
    Yang, Xianxian
    Gu, Shuo
    Li, Hao
    Zin, Mar Aung
    Mooi, Wei Jun
    Han, Wenqing
    Zhang, Yan
    Chai, Gang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (04) : 357 - 364
  • [5] A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion
    Chen, Yi-Jane
    Yao, Chung-Chen
    Chang, Zwei-Chieng
    Lai, Hsiang-Hua
    Lu, Shao-Chun
    Kok, Sang-Heng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (06) : 676 - 683
  • [6] Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure technical note
    d'Hauthuille, C
    Taha, F
    Devauchelle, B
    Testelin, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 34 (02) : 197 - 201
  • [7] El Hadidi Y.N., 2021, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V32
  • [8] The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intraoral Distractors and the Extraoral Distractors Used in Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia Patients: A Simulation Finite Element Analysis Study
    El Hadidi, Yasser Nabil
    Askar, Mohamed Gamal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (08) : 2621 - 2625
  • [9] The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intra-oral Distractors and the Extra-oral Distractors Used in Treatment of Post Ankylosis Facial Asymmetric Patients: A Finite Element Analysis Study
    Elhadidi, Yasser Nabil
    Askar, Mohamed Gamal
    El Sayed, Abdulmotakaber Galal Abdullatif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : 1977 - 1980
  • [10] A Systematic Review to Uncover a Universal Protocol for Accuracy Assessment of 3-Dimensional Virtually Planned Orthognathic Surgery
    Gaber, Ramy M.
    Shaheen, Eman
    Falter, Bart
    Araya, Sebastian
    Politis, Constantinus
    Swennen, Gwen R. J.
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (11) : 2430 - 2440