Wave Mode Identification of Acoustic Emission Signals Using Phase Analysis

被引:7
作者
Barroso-Romero, Maria [1 ]
Gagar, Daniel [2 ]
Pant, Shashank [3 ]
Martinez, Marcias [4 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Struct Integr & Composites Grp, Kluyverweg 1, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Aerosp Transport & Mfg, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[3] Natl Res Council Canada, Aerosp Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[4] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
来源
ACOUSTICS | 2019年 / 1卷 / 02期
关键词
Acoustic Emission; Guided Lamb wave propagation; complex structures; Structural Health Monitoring (SHM);
D O I
10.3390/acoustics1020026
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Acoustic Emission (AE) monitoring can be used to detect and locate structural damage such as growing fatigue cracks. The accuracy of damage location and consequently the inference of its significance for damage assessment is dependent on the wave propagation properties in terms of wave velocity, dispersion, attenuation and wave mode conversion. These behaviors are understood and accounted for in simplistic structures; however, actual structures are geometrically complex, with components comprising of different materials. One of the key challenges in such scenarios is the ability to positively identify wave modes and correctly associate their properties for damage location analysis. In this study, a novel method for wave mode identification is presented based on phase and instantaneous frequency analysis. Finite Element (FE) simulations and experiments on a representative aircraft wing structure were conducted to evaluate the performance of the technique. The results show how a phase analysis obtained from a Hilbert Transform of the wave signal in combination with variations of the instantaneous frequency of the wave signal, can be used to determine the arrival and therefore identification of the different wave modes on a complex structure. The methodology outlined in this paper was proven on an Automatic Sensor Test wave signal, Pencil Lead Breaks and Hanning windows and it was shown that the percentage difference is between 3% and 15% for the A(0) and S-0 wave speed respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 472
页数:23
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267
  • [2] American Society of Composites, 1995, 10 TECHN C 17 OCT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, J ACOUST EMISS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, PIEZOELECTRIC ENERGY, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119991151.APP1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, AMSY 6 HDB
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1983, LONG TERM BEHAV COMP, DOI DOI 10.1520/STP31820S
  • [7] Comparison of alternatives to amplitude thresholding for onset detection of acoustic emission signals
    Bai, F.
    Gagar, D.
    Foote, P.
    Zhao, Y.
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 84 : 717 - 730
  • [8] Delta T source location for acoustic emission
    Baxter, Matthew Geoffrey
    Pullin, Rhys
    Holford, Karen M.
    Evans, Sam L.
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 21 (03) : 1512 - 1520
  • [9] Boon M.J.G.N., 2014, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
  • [10] Chen L., 2012, P MICR MILL WAV CIRC