Analysis of Age-Friendly Cancer Care Readiness

被引:9
|
作者
Lynch, Mary Pat [1 ]
Kagan, Sarah H. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, Teresa Hagan [3 ]
Fennimore, Laura [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Penn Hosp, Penn Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Gerontol Nursing, Penn Hosp,Penn Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh Penn, Sch Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
older adult patients with cancer; age-friendly cancer care; ageism; 4M framework; OLDER-ADULTS; SURVIVORSHIP CARE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1188/21.ONF.333-340
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Cancer care attuned to meeting the needs of older adults is imperative to ensure that they receive appropriate levels of treatment in accordance with their goals of care. Achieving age-friendly systems and geriatric-competent workforces require rethinking current models of cancer care delivery. This article reports on a descriptive study on the readiness of U.S. cancer programs to provide age-friendly cancer care. SAMPLE & SETTING: A survey was sent to 567 ambulatory oncology leaders in the United States. Of the 81 respondents, 61 answered all questions. METHODS & VARIABLES: The authors developed and administered an online survey assessing cancer programs' age-friendly cancer care practices and readiness. Survey questions were based on the elements of the 4Ms framework. Results were analyzed using frequencies and percentages for categorically measured survey items and measures of central tendency for continuously scaled survey items. RESULTS: 67% of respondents reported that their program could deliver age-friendly cancer care within five years. Respondents less frequently indicated that they employed specific 4Ms elements: medications (41%), mobility (32%), mentation (14%), and what matters (11%). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The results of this study suggest gaps in readiness to implement age-friendly cancer care. Recommendations to improve readiness include increasing awareness, expanding workforce preparation, and improving cancer program leadership engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perspectives on implementing an ambulatory age-friendly health system pilot project
    Vonnes, Cassandra
    Gallenstein, Donna
    Poiley, Lauren
    McDaniel, Gina A.
    Mason, Tina M.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (08) : 1287 - 1290
  • [22] Age-friendly Environment and Aging in Place: Finding from Latent Profile Analysis
    Kim, Seon
    Kim, Junpyo
    Kim, Kyeongmo
    Buckley, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 98 (04) : 499 - 514
  • [23] Age-friendly cities and communities: a review and future directions
    Torku, Alex
    Chan, Albert Ping Chuen
    Yung, Esther Hiu Kwan
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2021, 41 (10) : 2242 - 2279
  • [24] A Global Pilot Study of Age-Friendly City Indicators
    Kano, Megumi
    Rosenberg, Paul E.
    Dalton, Sean D.
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2018, 138 (03) : 1205 - 1227
  • [25] Creating age-friendly nursing homes: The time is now
    Bhattacharyya, Kallol Kumar
    Molinari, Victor
    Black, Kathy
    Whitbourne, Susan Krauss
    GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION, 2023, 44 (04) : 613 - 630
  • [26] Ageing in urban environments: Developing 'age-friendly' cities
    Buffel, Tine
    Phillipson, Chris
    Scharf, Thomas
    CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 32 (04) : 597 - 617
  • [27] Coalition building to create an Age-Friendly University (AFU)
    Andreoletti, Carrie
    June, Andrea
    GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION, 2019, 40 (02) : 142 - 152
  • [28] Planners' views on age-friendly environment in urban planning
    Padeiro, Miguel
    CADERNOS DE GEOGRAFIA, 2024, (50):
  • [29] Examining collaboration across organizations in an age-friendly community
    Teixeira-Poit, Stephanie M.
    JOURNAL OF WOMEN & AGING, 2020, 32 (01) : 91 - 113
  • [30] Towards Age-friendly Exergame Design: The Role of Familiarity
    Zhang, Hao
    Wu, Qiong
    Miao, Chunyan
    Shen, Zhiqi
    Leung, Cyril
    CHI PLAY'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION IN PLAY, 2019, : 45 - 57