Pulmonary nodules: Effect on detection of spiral CT pitch

被引:33
作者
Wright, AR [1 ]
Collie, DA [1 ]
Williams, JR [1 ]
HashemiMalayeri, B [1 ]
Stevenson, AJM [1 ]
Turnbull, CM [1 ]
机构
[1] WESTERN GEN HOSP,DEPT MED PHYS & MED ENGN,EDINBURGH EH4 2XU,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
关键词
lung; nodule; 60.332; 60.333; lung neoplasms; CT; 60.12115; staging;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.199.3.8638014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare spiral computed tomography (CT) performed at increased pitch with spiral CT performed at standard pitch in the detection of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT scanning of the thorax was performed with a pitch of 1.0 in 109 patients with pulmonary nodules due to metastases. The patients were also randomly assigned to undergo further scanning with a pitch of 1.2 (n = 34), 1.5 (n = 37), or 2.0 (n = 38) at the same scanning session. The scan pairs were analyzed for number, size, and distribution of nodules. RESULTS: A bias toward undercounting was noted on scans with a pitch of 1.5 and 2.0; however, this was not statistically significant. Correlation coefficients were r = .982, r = .977, and r = .989 for scans of pitch 1.2, 1.5, and 2.0, respectively. Disease in one patient would have been prospectively understaged from findings on a scan of pitch 2.0 because of poor conspicuity of a small solitary nodule. CONCLUSION: Findings from scans with increased pitch generally agree well with those from scans with standard pitch; however, there is a greater risk of understaging of disease in patients with solitary nodules as pitch increases. Pitch should be limited to no greater than 1.5 for initial staging of pulmonary metastatic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 841
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
HEYWANGKOEBRUNNER SH, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V185, P131
[12]   LUNG METASTASES [J].
KAGAN, AR ;
STECKEL, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (03) :473-476
[13]   SPIRAL VOLUMETRIC CT WITH SINGLE-BREATH-HOLD TECHNIQUE, CONTINUOUS TRANSPORT, AND CONTINUOUS SCANNER ROTATION [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
SEISSLER, W ;
KLOTZ, E ;
VOCK, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :181-183
[14]   A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND SPIRAL CT - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY ON THE DETECTION OF SPHERICAL LESIONS [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
POLACIN, A ;
SUSS, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1994, 18 (02) :167-176
[15]   FAILURE TO DETECT A 1.5 CENTIMETER LUNG NODULE BY CHEST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
KRUDY, AG ;
DOPPMAN, JL ;
HERDT, JR .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1982, 6 (06) :1178-1180
[16]  
LIBSHITZ HI, 1982, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V20, P437
[17]   EVALUATION OF SECTION SENSITIVITY PROFILES AND IMAGE NOISE IN SPIRAL CT [J].
POLACIN, A ;
KALENDER, WA ;
MARCHAL, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) :29-35
[18]   PULMONARY NODULES - DETECTION WITH THICK-SECTION SPIRAL CT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL CT [J].
REMYJARDIN, M ;
REMY, J ;
GIRAUD, F ;
MARQUETTE, CH .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (02) :513-520
[19]   SMALL PULMONARY NODULES - DYNAMIC CT WITH A SINGLE-BREATH TECHNIQUE [J].
SHAFFER, K ;
PUGATCH, RD .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (02) :567-568
[20]   PITFALLS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF METASTATIC DISEASE OR LOCAL TUMOR EXTENSION WITH MODERN IMAGING TECHNIQUES [J].
STECKEL, RJ ;
KAGAN, RA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (07) :818-823