Public Engagement and the Impact of Fairness Perceptions on Decision Favorability and Acceptance

被引:95
|
作者
Besley, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
fairness; justice; political communication; public engagement; nuclear; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; NUCLEAR-POWER; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MEDIA; TRUST; MODEL; ATTITUDES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/1075547009358624
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Drawing on the social-psychological theory about justice, the current study uses survey data collected during a public engagement process related to nuclear energy to test the relative impact of perceptions about the fairness of outcomes, decision procedures, and interpersonal treatment in predicting both perceived favorability of a decision and willingness to accept a decision. Media use, interpersonal discussion, competence, and risk perceptions (worry) are used as control variables alongside standard demographics in hierarchical ordinary least squares regression models. The study finds that believing one receives a fair outcome is associated with decision favorability, while all forms of fairness perceptions are associated with acceptance. The implication is that perceptions about both outcome and nonoutcome forms of fairness are important to consider when assessing public engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 280
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: the role of public engagement
    Decker, Marie Christin
    Wegner, Laila
    Leicht-Scholten, Carmen
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [2] The Apparent Locus of Managerial Decision Making and Perceptions of Fairness in Public Personnel Management
    Stritch, Justin M.
    Pedersen, Mogens Jin
    PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 48 (03) : 392 - 412
  • [3] Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: The role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement
    Wang, Shanyong
    Wang, Jing
    Lin, Shoufu
    Li, Jun
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 126 : 352 - 360
  • [4] Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: Fairness Perceptions of Group vs. Individual Decision Makers
    Kouchaki, Maryam
    Smith, Isaac H.
    Netchaeva, Ekaterina
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (05) : 1301 - 1315
  • [5] Worldviews, trust, and risk perceptions shape public acceptance of COVID-19 public health measures
    Siegrist, Michael
    Bearth, Angela
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (24)
  • [6] Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making
    Smith, PD
    McDonough, MH
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2001, 14 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [7] The fair process effect in taxation: the roles of procedural fairness, outcome favorability and outcome fairness in the acceptance of tax authority decisions
    Niesiobedzka, Malgorzata
    Kolodziej, Sabina
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 39 (01) : 246 - 253
  • [8] Public acceptance of offshore wind power: does perceived fairness of process matter?
    Firestone, Jeremy
    Kempton, Willett
    Lilley, Meredith Blaydes
    Samoteskul, Kateryna
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 55 (10) : 1387 - 1402
  • [9] FAIRNESS FOR ALL? PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF PLEA BARGAINING
    Khogali, Mawia
    Jones, Kristyn
    Penrod, Steve
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2018, 14 (02): : 136 - 153
  • [10] Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants
    Visschers, Vivianne H. M.
    Siegrist, Michael
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 46 : 292 - 300