Restraint and cancellation: Multiple inhibition deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

被引:211
作者
Schachar, Russell
Logan, Gordon D.
Robaey, Philippe
Chen, Shirley
Ickowicz, Abel
Barr, Cathy
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Psychiat, Brain & Behav Program,Res Inst,Psychiat Res Unit, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[3] Univ Montreal, Hop St Justine, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[4] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Hlth Network, Toronto Western Res Inst, Dept Psychiat,Cellular & Mol Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ADHD; inhibition; stop task;
D O I
10.1007/s10802-006-9075-2
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We used variations of the stop signal task to study two components of motor response inhibition-the ability to withhold a strong response tendency (restraint) and the ability to cancel an ongoing action (cancellation)-in children with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and in non-ADHD controls of similar age (ages 7-14 years). The goal was to determine if restraint and cancellation were related and if both were deficient in ADHD. The stop signal task involved a choice reaction time task (go task) which required a rapid response. The demand for inhibitory control was invoked through the presentation of a stop signal on a subset of go trials which required that the ongoing response be suspended. The stop signal was presented either concurrently with the go signal (restraint version) or after a variable delay (cancellation version). In Study 1, we compared ADHD and control children on the cancellation version of the stop task; in Study 2, we compared ADHD and controls on the restraint version. In Study 3, a subset of ADHD and control participants completed both tasks so that we could examine convergence of these dimensions of inhibition. Compared to control participants, ADHD participants showed a deficit both in the ability to cancel and to restrain a speeded motor response. Performance on the restraint version was significantly correlated with performance on the cancellation version in controls, but not in ADHD participants. We conclude that ADHD is associated with deficits in both restraint and cancellation subcomponents of inhibition.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 238
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: Relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Aron, AR ;
Poldrack, RA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 57 (11) :1285-1292
[2]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[3]   Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Robbins, TW ;
Poldrack, RA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) :170-177
[4]   Measuring impulsivity in school-aged boys and examining its relationship with ADHD and ODD ratings [J].
Avila, C ;
Cuenca, I ;
Félix, V ;
Parcet, MA ;
Miranda, A .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 32 (03) :295-304
[5]   Working memory and vigilance: Evidence from normal aging and Alzheimer's disease [J].
Baddeley, A ;
Cocchini, G ;
Della Sala, S ;
Logie, RH ;
Spinnler, H .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1999, 41 (01) :87-108
[6]   Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms [J].
Band, GPH ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :179-211
[7]   Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Logan, GD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2003, 112 (02) :105-142
[8]  
Barkley RA, 1997, J DEV BEHAV PEDIATR, V18, P271
[9]   The executive functions and self-regulation: An evolutionary neuropsychological perspective [J].
Barkley, RA .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 11 (01) :1-29
[10]   CONTINUING AND REVERSING DIRECTION OF RESPONDING MOVEMENTS - SOME EXCEPTIONS TO SO-CALLED PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD [J].
BREBNER, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 78 (01) :120-&