Improving Filtered Backprojection Reconstruction by Data-Dependent Filtering

被引:34
作者
Pelt, Daniel M. [1 ]
Batenburg, Kees Joost [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Wiskunde & Informat, NL-1090 GB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Math Inst, NL-2311 EZ Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, iMinds Vis Lab, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Tomography; image reconstruction; algebraic methods; TOMOGRAPHIC RECONSTRUCTION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/TIP.2014.2341971
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Filtered backprojection, one of the most widely used reconstruction methods in tomography, requires a large number of low-noise projections to yield accurate reconstructions. In many applications of tomography, complete projection data of high quality cannot be obtained, because of practical considerations. Algebraic methods tend to handle such problems better, but are computationally more expensive. In this paper, we introduce a new method that improves the filtered backprojection method by using a custom data-dependent filter that minimizes the projection error of the resulting reconstruction. We show that the computational cost of the new method is significantly lower than that of algebraic methods. Experiments on both simulation and experimental data show that the method is able to produce more accurate reconstructions than filtered backprojection based on popular static filters when presented with data with a limited number of projections or statistical noise present. Furthermore, the results show that the method produces reconstructions with similar accuracy to algebraic methods, but is faster at producing them. Finally, we show that the method can be extended to exploit certain forms of prior knowledge, improving reconstruction accuracy in specific cases.
引用
收藏
页码:4750 / 4762
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Kunze H., 2007, P 9 INT M FULL 3 DIM, P309
[12]  
Ludwig J, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5116, P612, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_85
[13]   THE RELEVANCE OF DOSE-FRACTIONATION IN TOMOGRAPHY OF RADIATION-SENSITIVE SPECIMENS [J].
MCEWEN, BF ;
DOWNING, KH ;
GLAESER, RM .
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1995, 60 (03) :357-373
[14]   Advantages of phase retrieval for fast x-ray tomographic microscopy [J].
Mokso, R. ;
Marone, F. ;
Irvine, S. ;
Nyvlt, M. ;
Schwyn, D. ;
Mader, K. ;
Taylor, G. K. ;
Krapp, H. G. ;
Skeren, M. ;
Stampanoni, M. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2013, 46 (49)
[15]  
Natterer F., 2001, Classics in Applied Mathematics
[16]   Filter calculation for x-ray tomosynthesis reconstruction [J].
Nielsen, Tim ;
Hitziger, Sebastian ;
Grass, Michael ;
Iske, Armin .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (12) :3915-3930
[17]   Python']Python for scientific computing [J].
Oliphant, Travis E. .
COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2007, 9 (03) :10-20
[18]   Performance improvements for iterative electron tomography reconstruction using graphics processing units (GPUs) [J].
Palenstijn, W. J. ;
Batenburg, K. J. ;
Sijbers, J. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 176 (02) :250-253
[19]   Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? [J].
Pan, Xiaochuan ;
Sidky, Emil Y. ;
Vannier, Michael .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2009, 25 (12)
[20]   Accelerating simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique with motion compensation using CUDA-enabled GPU [J].
Pang, Wai-Man ;
Qin, Jing ;
Lu, Yuqiang ;
Xie, Yongming ;
Chui, Chee-Kong ;
Heng, Pheng-Ann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2011, 6 (02) :187-199