Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial

被引:101
|
作者
Cairo, Francesco [1 ]
Barbato, Luigi [1 ]
Tonelli, Paolo [1 ]
Batalocco, Guido
Pagavino, Gabriella [1 ]
Nieri, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Surg & Translat Med, Res Unit Periodontol & Periodontal Med, Florence, Italy
关键词
collagen matrix; connective tissue graft; dental implants; keratinized tissue; randomized clinical trial; soft tissue augmentation; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; PLASTIC-SURGERY PROCEDURES; CRESTAL BONE STABILITY; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; GINGIVAL RECESSIONS; EFFICACY; VOLUME; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jcpe.12750
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundPeri-implant soft tissue may be critical to prevent inflammation and promote gingival margin stability. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to compare xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) versus connective tissue graft (CTG) to increase buccal soft tissue thickness at implant site. Materials and methodsSoft tissue augmentation with XCM (test) or CTG (control) was performed at 60 implants in 60 patients at the time of implant uncovering. Measurements were performed by a blinded examiner at baseline, 3 and 6months. Outcome measures included buccal soft tissue thickness (GT), apico-coronal keratinized tissue (KT), chair time and post-operative discomfort. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patient satisfaction. ResultsAfter 6months, the final GT increase was 0.90.2 in the XCM group and 1.2 +/- 0.3mm in the CTG group, with a significant difference favouring the control group (0.3mm; p=.0001). Both procedures resulted in similar final KT amount with no significant difference between treatments. XCM was associated with significant less chair-time (p<.0001), less post-operative pain (p<.0001), painkillers intake (p<.0001) and higher final satisfaction than CTG (p=.0195). ConclusionCTG was more effective than XCM to increase buccal peri-implant soft tissue thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 776
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Igor Ashurko
    Svetlana Tarasenko
    Aleksandr Esayan
    Alexandr Kurkov
    Karen Mikaelyan
    Maxim Balyasin
    Anna Galyas
    Julia Kustova
    Silvio Taschieri
    Stefano Corbella
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 7191 - 7208
  • [2] Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Ashurko, Igor
    Tarasenko, Svetlana
    Esayan, Aleksandr
    Kurkov, Alexandr
    Mikaelyan, Karen
    Balyasin, Maxim
    Galyas, Anna
    Kustova, Julia
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Corbella, Stefano
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (12) : 7191 - 7208
  • [3] Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation at immediately placed implants: a prospective clinical trial
    De Angelis, P.
    Rella, E.
    Manicone, P. F.
    Liguori, M. G.
    De Rosa, G.
    Cavalcanti, C.
    Galeazzi, N.
    D'Addona, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (10) : 1097 - 1105
  • [4] Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants
    De Angelis, P.
    De Angelis, S.
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Liguori, M. G.
    Pompa, G.
    Papi, P.
    Manicone, P. F.
    D'Addona, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 956 - 963
  • [5] Volumetric soft tissue alterations in the early healing phase after peri- implant soft tissue contour augmentation with a porcine collagen matrix versus the autologous connective tissue graft: A controlled clinical trial
    Schmitt, Christian M.
    Brueckbauer, Patrick
    Schlegel, Karl A.
    Buchbender, Mayte
    Adler, Werner
    Matta, Ragai E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 48 (01) : 145 - 162
  • [6] Efficacy of a collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation after implant placement compared to connective tissue grafts: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jepsen, Karin
    Sailer, Irena
    Strasding, Malin
    Zeltner, Marco
    Cordaro, Luca
    Mirisola di Torresanto, Vincenzo
    Schwarz, Frank
    Zuhr, Otto
    Akakpo, Dodji
    Bonnet, Franck
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (09) : 999 - 1013
  • [7] Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Increase at Small Buccal Bone Dehiscences With Either Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Francesco, Ferrarotti
    Giacomo, Baima
    Giulia, Mohammadi
    Clelia, Carboncini
    Federica, Romano
    Mario, Aimetti
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [8] Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Gasser, Thomas J. W.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 94 (02) : 230 - 243
  • [9] Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix as an Alternative to Free Gingival Grafting for Oral Soft Tissue Augmentation
    McGuire, Michael K.
    Scheyer, E. Todd
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (10) : 1333 - 1341
  • [10] Peri-implant soft-tissue esthetic outcome after immediate implant placement in conjunction with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix or connective tissue graft: A randomized controlled clinical study
    Happe, Arndt
    Schmidt, Alexander
    Neugebauer, Joerg
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (01) : 215 - 225