Environmental-economic evaluation of sugar cane bagasse gasification power plants versus combined-cycle gas power plants

被引:0
作者
Mohammadi, F. [1 ]
Abdoli, M. A. [1 ]
Amidpour, M. [2 ]
Vahidi, H. [3 ]
Gitipour, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Dept Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Khaje Nasir Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Grad Univ Adv Technol, Inst Sci & High Technol & Environm Sci, Dept Environm, Kerman, Iran
来源
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM | 2020年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
Combined Heat and Power (CHP); Economic Evaluation; Gasification; Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE); Natural Gas Power Plant; Sugar Cane Bagasse; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; CONVERSION; COST;
D O I
10.22034/gjesm.2020.01.06
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Approximately 2.4 million tons of bagasse are produced each year in Iran, most of which are currently treated as waste adding to serious environmental concerns. Application of bagasse for energy production is a sustainable solution to supply the required energy within the sugar refineries and export the surplus electricity to the grid. Currently, the energy demand in Iranian sugar mills is mainly supplied by fossil fuels (natural gas or mazut). Bagasse fluidized bed and fixed bed gasification plants would respectively lead to save 59,250 and 21,750 tons of CO2 annually, compared to gas power plants of the same scale. The present study aims to compare the environmental economic analysis of electricity generation in 10-MW gas-fired power plants with that electricity generation in bagasse gasification plants (with fluidized bed and fixed bed reactors) exemplarily in Iran. The bagasse fluidized bed gasification option (with IRR of 28.6%) showed the most promising economic viability compared to bagasse fixed bed gasification and gas power plant cases with IRR values of 25.09 and 21.94%, respectively. Furthermore, bagasse gasification options were potentially characterized by a better environmental performance compared to fossil-fuelled options. On the other hand, the obtained levelised cost of electricity at gas power plants (2 cents/kWh) was lower than the global range and lower than bagasse gasification cases (7-9 cents/kWh). The results revealed the vital need of biomass power plants to governmental support in order to compete with fossil power plants by participation of private sector. (c) 2020 GJESM. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 84
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation [J].
Ahmad, Anis Atikah ;
Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah ;
Kasim, Farizul Hafiz ;
Inayat, Abrar ;
Khasri, Azduwin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 53 :1333-1347
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, America's Children and The Environment, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 09008 NNFCC E4TECH, P1
[4]   Pre-processing of sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system: A comprehensive review [J].
Anukam, Anthony ;
Mamphweli, Sampson ;
Reddy, Prashant ;
Meyer, Edson ;
Okoh, Omobola .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 66 :775-801
[5]  
Ardila YC, 2012, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V30, P1093
[6]   Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review [J].
Asadullah, Mohammad .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :201-215
[7]  
Avami A., 2007, Int. J. Energy, V1, P65
[8]  
Azadi P., 2017, Stanford Iran, V2040, P1
[9]   Use of biomass sources for energy in Turkey and a view to biomass potential [J].
Balat, M .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 29 (01) :32-41
[10]  
Blok K, 2013, HDB NOVEL METHODOLOG, P1