Peripheral neuromodulation via posterior tibial nerve stimulation - a potential treatment for faecal incontinence?

被引:41
作者
Findlay, John M. [1 ]
Yeung, Justin M. C. [1 ]
Robinson, Rachel [2 ]
Greaves, Helen [2 ]
Maxwell-Armstrong, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Med Ctr, Dept Digest Dis & Thorac, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Ilkeston Community Hosp, Ilkeston, England
关键词
Neuromodulation; Stimulation; PTNS; Faecal; Incontinence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
D O I
10.1308/003588410X12628812459652
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION Faecal incontinence is a prevalent and important condition, with a range of treatment options. Neuromodulation via sacral nerve stimulators is efficacious, but expensive and associated with complications due to device implantation. Peripheral neuromodulation via posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has been assessed in urinary incontinence, but there is minimal evidence for its use in faecal incontinence and no literature from the UK. This retrospective review aimed to assess the efficacy of PTNS in faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirteen consecutive female patients with faecal incontinence of various causes (9 idiopathic, 3 obstetric, 1 surgery) underwent PINS at a UK hospital. All were investigated with colonic imaging, anorectal physiology and endo-anal ultrasound. Prior treatments included physiotherapy (13), sphincteroplasty (3) biofeedback (3) and PTQ implants (1). PTNS was performed for 30 min, weekly for 12 weeks. RESULTS Median monthly episodes of incontinence of wind, liquid and solid reduced from 6, 10 and 18 respectively to 0 with 12 weeks' treatment (P < 0.05). Significant improvements in quality of life indices were also seen. At 1-month follow up, a sustained reduction in incontinence of wind was seen (0 episodes), with non-significant reductions of liquid and solid stool. CONCLUSIONS PTNS is a potentially efficacious, technically simple and minimally invasive alternative treatment modality for faecal incontinence. These early results are encouraging, but we await medium- and long-term follow-up, and a larger randomised trial comparing PTNS with alternative treatments and placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 390
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SYSTEMATIC REV EFFIC
[2]   Fecal incontinence - a review [J].
Bellicini, Nicolas ;
Molloy, Peter J. ;
Caushaj, Phillip ;
Kozlowski, Pamelasue .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (01) :41-46
[3]   Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults [J].
Brown, S. R. ;
Nelson, R. L. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (02)
[4]  
Counihan TC, 2005, CURRENT THERAPY COLO, P105
[5]   Evaluation of the Use of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study [J].
de la Portilla, Fernando ;
Rada, Ricardo ;
Vega, Juan ;
Almeida Gonzalez, Carmen ;
Cisneros, Nieves ;
Hugo Maldonado, Victor .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (08) :1427-1433
[6]  
Finazzi Agro E, 2005, Minerva Urol Nefrol, V57, P119
[7]  
Johanson JF, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P33
[8]   Use of peripheral neuromodulation of the S3 region for treatment of detrusor overactivity: A urodynamic-based study [J].
Klingler, HC ;
Pycha, A ;
Schmidbauer, J ;
Marberger, M .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) :766-771
[9]   Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence [J].
Madoff, RD .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (01) :S48-S54
[10]   Faecal incontinence in adults [J].
Madoff, RD ;
Parker, SC ;
Varma, MG ;
Lowry, AC .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9434) :621-632