Evaluating survey research in articles published in Library Science journals

被引:1
作者
Antonio Salvador-Olivan, Jose [1 ]
Marco-Cuenca, Gonzalo [1 ]
Arquero-Aviles, Rosario [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Ciencias Documentac & Hist Ciencia, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, Fac Ciencias Documentac, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA | 2021年 / 44卷 / 02期
关键词
survey research; Library Science; research quality assessment; research methodology; research techniques and methods; TOTAL SURVEY ERROR; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; PUBLICATIONS; NONRESPONSE; FUTURE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3989/redc.2021.2.1774
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction and objective: Survey research is a method frequently used in Library Science. The main objective of this study is to evaluate if the studies carried out in the field of Library Science, that use surveys as a research method, provide complete and detailed information on their design and execution. Methods: Scientific papers published in 2019 in journals in the Library Science area included in the Journal Citation Reports, that used surveys as a quantitative research method, were selected from the Web of Science database. To assess the degree of information coverage, a tool was created consisting of 32 items used in various guides and recommendations. Results and conclusions: most of the scientific papers based on surveys in Library Science present a serious deficiency on the information provided. It is necessary to improve and complete information about the sampling procedure, development and administration of the questionnaire, as well as on the analysis of its results. This information will allow us to evaluate the potential errors made and, consequently, the quality and validity of the conclusions reached.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study
    Abrizah, A.
    Noorhidawati, A.
    Zainab, A. N.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 102 (02) : 1083 - 1099
  • [2] American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), 2020, BEST PRACT SURV RES
  • [3] American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), 2015, TRANSP IN DISC EL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, FUTURE SURVEY RES CH
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, The code of professional ethics and practices
  • [6] Baker R., 2016, AAPOR REPORT EVALUAT
  • [7] Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices
    Bennett, Carol
    Khangura, Sara
    Brehaut, Jamie C.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Moher, David
    Potter, Beth K.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (08)
  • [8] Survey research and libraries: Not necessarily like in the textbooks
    Bertot, John Carlo
    Jaeger, Paul T.
    [J]. LIBRARY QUARTERLY, 2008, 78 (01): : 99 - 105
  • [9] Selection Bias in Web Surveys
    Bethlehem, Jelke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2010, 78 (02) : 161 - 188
  • [10] Biemer P, 2009, HANDB STAT, V29A, P281, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7161(08)00012-6