'All things are in flux': China in global science

被引:64
作者
Marginson, Simon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford OX2 6PY, Oxon, England
[2] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Research; Science; Globalisation; Higher education; International comparisons; China; INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH COLLABORATION; HIGHER-EDUCATION; CITATIONS; STATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China's science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 910
页数:30
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Adams J., 2018, FRONTIERS RES METRIC, V3, DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00012
[2]   The fourth age of research [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2013, 497 (7451) :557-560
[3]  
Altbach P., 2016, U WORLD NEWS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NATURE, V579, P8, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-00625-0
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, THE ECONOMIST 0112
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GLOBAL CREATION SPAC
[7]   The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Adams, Jonathan ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2018, 12 (03) :931-949
[8]  
Bush Richard C., 2019, Order from Chaos
[9]  
Castells Manuel., 2009, The Rise of the NetWork Society, V2nd ed., DOI [10.1002/9781444319514, DOI 10.1002/9781444319514]
[10]   International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies? [J].
Chen, Kaihua ;
Zhang, Yi ;
Fu, Xiaolan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (01) :149-168