Current and future financial competitiveness of electricity and heat from energy crops: A case study from Ireland

被引:35
作者
Styles, David
Jones, Michael B.
机构
[1] US EPA, Dublin 14, Ireland
[2] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Sch Nat Sci, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
energy crops; economics; heating;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It has been demonstrated that Miscanthus and willow energy-crop cultivation could be economically competitive with current agricultural land uses at a farm-gate biomass price ranging from euro70 to euro130 t(-1) dry matter [Styles, D., Thorne, F., Jones, M.B., in review. Energy crops in Ireland: An economic comparison of willow and Miscanthus production with conventional farming systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, May 2006]. This paper uses the same farm-gate prices to calculate the economic competitiveness of energy crop electricity and heat production, using a net-present-value (NPV) approach (20-year period, 5% discount rate). Direct and gasified co-firing of willow wood with coal would result in electricity generation 30%, or 37% more expensive than coal generation, at current coal and CO2 allowance prices and a farm-gate biomass cost of euro100 t(-1). 'Break-even' CO2 allowance prices are euro33 and euro37 t(-1) respectively. However, co-firing of Miscanthus with peat is close to economic competitiveness, and would require a CO2 allowance price of euro16 t(-1) to break-even (against a current price of euro12 t(-1)). NPV analyses indicate that wood heat is significantly cheaper than oil, gas or electric heat, excluding existing wood-boiler installation subsidies. Discounted annual savings range from euro143 compared with gas to euro722 compared with electric heating at the domestic scale and from euro3454 to euro11,222 at the commercial scale. Inclusion of available subsidies improves the comparative economics of domestic wood heat substantially. The economic advantage of wood heat is robust to variation in fuel prices, discount rates and heat loads. The greatest obstacles to energy-crop utilisation include: (i) a reluctance to consider long-term economics; (ii) possible competition from cheaper sources of biomass; (iii) the need for a spatially coordinated supply and utilisation network. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4355 / 4367
页数:13
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy
    Baxter, L
    [J]. FUEL, 2005, 84 (10) : 1295 - 1302
  • [2] Opportunities for biomass-derived "bio-oil" in European heat and power markets
    Brammer, J. G.
    Lauer, M.
    Bridgwater, A. V.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) : 2871 - 2880
  • [3] The modelled productivity of Miscanthus x giganteus (GREEF et DEU) in Ireland
    Clifton-Brown, JC
    Neilson, B
    Lewandowski, I
    Jones, MB
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2000, 12 (02) : 97 - 109
  • [4] Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices
    Faaij, APC
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (03) : 322 - 342
  • [5] Technical, environmental and economic analysis of co-firing of gasified biofuel in a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) combined heat and power (CHP) plant
    Marbe, Asa
    Harvey, Simon
    Berntsson, Thore
    [J]. ENERGY, 2006, 31 (10-11) : 1614 - 1631
  • [6] Biomass cofiring: the technology, the experience, the combustion consequences
    Tillman, DA
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2000, 19 (06) : 365 - 384
  • [7] Potentials for electricity production from wood in Ireland
    van den Broek, R
    Teeuwisse, S
    Healion, K
    Kent, T
    van Wijk, A
    Faaij, A
    Turkenburg, W
    [J]. ENERGY, 2001, 26 (11) : 991 - 1013
  • [8] [No title captured]