Influences of transaction costs in environmental policy

被引:125
作者
Coggan, Anthea [1 ]
Whitten, Stuart M. [2 ]
Bennett, Jeff [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[2] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Econ & Govt, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
Transaction costs; Environmental policy; Influences; ECONOMICS; CHOICE; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is a growing literature reporting the extent of transaction costs for environmental policies. However understanding why transaction costs occur and why they are small or large is also important for efficient policy selection and evaluation. Following an analysis of the organisational economics literature and reports of the extent of transaction costs for a number of environmental policies, three key influences to transaction costs in environmental policies are identified. These are the following: 1) the characteristics of the transaction for the environmental good: 2) the nature of the transactors: and 3) the current institutional environment and arrangements. These affect transaction costs to the government and all other parties influenced by a policy. Transaction costs occur due to actions of information collection and policy design, policy enactment and establishment, implementation and contracting, administration and monitoring, and enforcement. An interrogation of transaction cost influences reveals that: 1) the influence varies between parties and is affected by the actions and interactions of and between all parties to a policy: 2) how transaction costs are experienced varies across time; and 3) who experiences transaction costs depends on the policy itself. Future policy selection and refinement will benefit from empirical analysis of the causes of transaction costs. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1777 / 1784
页数:8
相关论文
共 82 条
[41]  
Lai LWC, 1997, PROG PLANN, V48, P161
[42]  
Libecap Gary., 1989, CONTRACTING PROPERTY
[43]   THE ECONOMICS OF INSTITUTIONS AND THE SOURCES OF GROWTH [J].
MATTHEWS, RCO .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1986, 96 (384) :903-918
[44]   Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies [J].
McCann, L ;
Colby, B ;
Easter, KW ;
Kasterine, A ;
Kuperan, KV .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 52 (04) :527-542
[45]   Transaction costs of policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota River [J].
McCann, L ;
Easter, KW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1999, 75 (03) :402-414
[46]  
McCann L., 2000, J AGRIC APPL ECON, V32, P555, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S1074070800020642, 10.1017/S1074070800020642]
[47]  
MENSAH AO, 2008, THESIS AUSTR NATL U
[48]  
Mettepenningen E., 2009, MULTIFUNCTIONAL RURA
[49]   Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes [J].
Mettepenningen, Evy ;
Verspecht, Ann ;
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (05) :649-667
[50]  
MILGROM P, 1992, ORG EFFICIENCY EC OR