Barriers to early cochlear implantation

被引:18
作者
Dettman, Shani [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Choo, Dawn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dowell, Richard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Audiol & Speech Pathol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] HEARing CRC, Carlton, Vic, Australia
关键词
Cochlear implant; paediatric; newborn hearing screening; demographics; hearing aids; LANGUAGE-DEVELOPMENT; DEAF-CHILDREN; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; AUDITORY DEVELOPMENT; SPOKEN LANGUAGE; HEARING-LOSS; RECEIVE; AGE; OUTCOMES; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2016.1174890
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Identify variables associated with paediatric access to cochlear implants (CIs). Design: Part 1. Trends over time for age at CI surgery (N=802) and age at hearing aid (HA) fitting (n=487) were examined with regard to periods before, during, and after newborn hearing screening (NHS). Part 2. Demographic factors were explored for 417 children implanted under 3 years of age. Part 3. Pre-implant steps for the first 20 children to receive CIs under 12 months were examined. Results: Part 1. Age at HA fitting and CI surgery reduced over time, and were associated with NHS implementation. Part 2. For children implanted under 3 years, earlier age at HA fitting and higher family socio-economic status were associated with earlier CI. Progressive hearing loss was associated with later CIs. Children with a Connexin 26 diagnosis received CIs earlier than children with a premature / low birth weight history. Part 3. The longest pre-CI steps were Step 1: Birth to diagnosis/identification of hearing loss (mean 16.43 weeks), and Step 11: MRI scans to implant surgery (mean 15.05 weeks) for the first 20 infants with CIs under 12 months. Conclusion: NHS implementation was associated with reductions in age at device intervention in this cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:S64 / S76
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Apuzzo Mah-Rya L., 1995, Seminars in Hearing, V16, P124, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1083710
[2]   Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation [J].
Baldassari, Cristina M. ;
Schmidt, Christine ;
Schubert, Christine M. ;
Srinivasan, Pratibha ;
Dodson, Kelley M. ;
Sismanis, Aristides .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2009, 140 (01) :114-119
[3]  
Blair M., 2014, ARCH DIS CHILD
[4]   Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs [J].
Busa, Jackie ;
Harrison, Judy ;
Chappell, Jodie ;
Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine ;
Grimes, Alison ;
Brookhouser, Patrick E. ;
Epstein, Stephen ;
Mehl, Albert ;
Vohr, Betty ;
Gravel, Judith ;
Roush, Jack ;
Widen, Judith ;
Benedict, Beth S. ;
Scoggins, Bobbie ;
King, Michelle ;
Pippins, Linda ;
Savage, David H. .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (04) :898-921
[5]  
CLARK GM, 1987, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V113, P825
[6]   The Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Newborn Screening for Bilateral Permanent Congenital Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review [J].
Colgan, Stephen ;
Gold, Lisa ;
Wirth, Karen ;
Ching, Teresa ;
Poulakis, Zeffie ;
Rickards, Field ;
Wake, Melissa .
ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2012, 12 (03) :171-180
[7]   Infants versus older children fitted with cochlear implants: Performance over 10 years [J].
Colletti, Liliana ;
Mandala, Marco ;
Zoccante, Leonardo ;
Shannon, Robert V. ;
Colletti, Vittorio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 75 (04) :504-509
[8]   Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: Report on 10 patients [J].
Colletti, V ;
Carner, M ;
Miorelli, V ;
Guida, M ;
Colletti, L ;
Fiorino, FG .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (03) :445-449
[9]   The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: Is there an added value for early implantation? [J].
Connor, Carol McDonald ;
Craig, Holly K. ;
Raudenbush, Stephen W. ;
Heavner, Krista ;
Zwolan, Teresa A. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2006, 27 (06) :628-644
[10]   Examining multiple sources of influence on the reading comprehension skills of children who use cochlear implants [J].
Connor, CM ;
Zwolan, TA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2004, 47 (03) :509-526