Achieving teamwork in stroke units: The contribution of opportunistic dialogue

被引:45
作者
Clarke, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Healthcare, Leeds LS2 9UT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
CARE; HEALTH; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.3109/13561820903163645
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Collaborative interdisciplinary working is central to contemporary health policy. The specialized and co-ordinated multidisciplinary care provided in stroke units is considered to contribute to improved patient outcomes in such units. However, how stroke unit teams co-ordinate their work is not clearly understood. This paper reports on a grounded theory study which explains how health professionals in two stroke units in northern England achieved teamwork. Data were generated through 220 hours of participant observation and 34 semi-structured interviews. Interviews were undertaken during and following participant observations. A basic social process common to teamworking in both units was identified; this was termed "opportunistic dialogue". The division of labour in respect of rehabilitation activities was negotiated through this interactional process. Co-location of most team members led to repeated engagement in sharing patient information and in exploring different perspectives. Opportunistic dialoguing contributed to mutual learning and explained the shift in thinking and team culture as team members moved from concern with discrete disciplinary actions to dialogue and negotiations focused on meeting patients' needs. The findings indicate that routinely incorporating periods of joint working in which team members articulate the reasoning for their decisions and interventions, contributes to achieving interdisciplinary teamworking in rehabilitation settings.</.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 297
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Inter-professional conflict and professionalization: dentistry and dental hygiene in Ontario [J].
Adams, TL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 58 (11) :2243-2252
[2]  
Adler P.A., 1998, COLLECTING INTERPRET, P79
[3]   Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers - A consensus statement from the brain attack coalition [J].
Alberts, MJ ;
Latchaw, RE ;
Selman, WR ;
Shephard, T ;
Hadley, MN ;
Brass, LM ;
Koroshetz, W ;
Marler, JR ;
Booss, J ;
Zorowitz, RD ;
Croft, JB ;
Magnis, E ;
Mulligan, D ;
Jagoda, A ;
O'Connor, R ;
Cawley, CM ;
Connors, JJ ;
Rose-DeRenzy, JA ;
Emr, M ;
Warren, M ;
Walker, MD .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (07) :1597-1616
[4]   Understanding complex trajectories in health and social care provision [J].
Allen, D ;
Griffiths, L ;
Lyne, P .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2004, 26 (07) :1008-1030
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[6]  
[Anonymous], NAT STROK STRAT
[7]   Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: a study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom [J].
Atwal, A ;
Caldwell, K .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2005, 19 (03) :268-273
[8]  
BARR H, 2003, INTERPROFESSIONAL CO
[9]   Experiences of nurses working in a stroke rehabilitation unit [J].
Barreca, Susan ;
Wilkins, Seanne .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 63 (01) :36-44
[10]   Benefits and losses: a qualitative study exploring healthcare staff perceptions of teamworking [J].
Baxter, S. K. ;
Brumfitt, S. M. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (02) :127-130