Climate Crises and Crypto-Colonialism: Conjuring Value on the Blockchain Frontiers of the Global South

被引:34
作者
Howson, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Arts & Humanities, Nottingham, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2020年 / 3卷
关键词
blockchain; crypto-colonialism; cryptocurrencies; green grabbing; climate crises; Global South;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2020.00022
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This commentary explores how climate crises are used to justify "crypto-colonialism," whereby blockchain technology is used to extract economic benefits from those suffering the scars of historic colonial expansion in the Global South. These benefits include land, labor, data and other resources needed to facilitate capital interests elsewhere. As with past neoliberal development agendas imposing structural economic reforms, the contemporary crypto-colonial exercises discussed here are driven in pursuit of a common good - to protect the global commons and improve people's lives. The paper explores how investors are drawn to the sustainable development frontiers - the code/spaces where crypto-colonial conjuring manifests. Blockchain is implicated within crypto-colonialism in three ways. Firstly, it plays into ongoing narratives of "green grabbing," where local claims to resources are liquidated for green investments. Secondly, the technology perpetuates North-South trade and investment inequalities, and thirdly, a new power asymmetry is enabled by the technology through data colonialism and surveillance capitalism. In reviewing the spaces where crypto-colonialism manifests, the paper argues that despite being distributed, techno-ecological fixes are never placeless. How people configure, use, and are impacted by blockchain platforms is geographically contingent.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Cloud geographies: Computing, data, sovereignty [J].
Amoore, Louise .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (01) :4-24
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LANDS END
[4]   Cryptic biodiversity loss linked to global climate change [J].
Balint, M. ;
Domisch, S. ;
Engelhardt, C. H. M. ;
Haase, P. ;
Lehrian, S. ;
Sauer, J. ;
Theissinger, K. ;
Pauls, S. U. ;
Nowak, C. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 1 (06) :313-318
[5]   Financialisation, Climate Finance, and the Calculative Challenges of Managing Environmental Change [J].
Bracking, Sarah .
ANTIPODE, 2019, 51 (03) :709-729
[6]   Sedimentary logics and the Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh [J].
Bremner, Lindsay .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 77
[7]   Resource triumphalism: postindustrial narratives of primary commodity production [J].
Bridge, G .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 2001, 33 (12) :2149-2173
[8]   Derivative Nature: interrogating the value of conservation in 'Boundless Southern Africa' [J].
Buescher, Bram .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2010, 31 (02) :259-276
[9]  
Buscher B., 2020, CONVERSATION REVOLUT
[10]   Under Pressure: Conceptualising Political Ecologies of Green Wars [J].
Buscher, Bram ;
Fletcher, Robert .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2018, 16 (02) :105-113