Nutrient enrichment, grazer identity, and their effects on epiphytic algal assemblages: field experiments in subtropical turtlegrass Thalassia testudinum meadows

被引:19
作者
Baggett, Lesley P. [1 ,2 ]
Heck, Kenneth L., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Frankovich, Thomas A. [3 ,4 ]
Armitage, Anna R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fourqurean, James W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dauphin Isl Sea Lab, Dauphin Isl, AL 36528 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Dept Marine Sci, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Marine Sci Program, Dept Biol Sci, N Miami, FL 33181 USA
[4] Florida Int Univ, SE Environm Res Ctr, N Miami, FL 33181 USA
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine Biol, Galveston, TX 77553 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Nutrient enrichment; Grazing; Seagrass; Epiphytes; Gastropods; Caridean shrimp; Hermit crab; EELGRASS ZOSTERA-MARINA; FLORIDA BAY; SEAGRASS ECOSYSTEMS; COMMUNITY; EUTROPHICATION; PHOSPHORUS; AMPHIPODS; NITROGEN; GROWTH; PHYTOPLANKTON;
D O I
10.3354/meps08533
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We tested the relative importance of top-down and bottom-up effects by experimentally evaluating the combined and separate effects of nutrient availability and grazer species composition on epiphyte communities and seagrass condition in Florida Bay. Although we succeeded in substantially enriching our experimental cylinders, as indicated by elevated nitrogen concentrations in epiphytes and seagrass leaves, we did not observe any major increases in epiphyte biomass or major loss of Thalassia testudinum by algal overgrowth. Additionally, we did not detect any strong grazer effects and found very few significant nutrient-grazer interactions. While this might suggest that there was no important differential response to nutrients by individual grazer species or by various combinations of grazers, our results were complicated by the lack of significant differences between control and grazer treatments, and as such, these results are best explained by the presence of unwanted amphipod grazers (mean = 471 ind. m(-2)) in the control cylinders. Our estimates of grazing rates and epiphyte productivities indicate that amphipods in the control cylinders could have lowered epiphyte biomass to the same level that the experimental grazers did, thus effectively transforming the control treatments into grazer treatments. If so, our experiments suggest that the effects of invertebrate grazing (and those of amphipods alone) were stronger than the effects of nutrient enrichment on epiphytic algae, and that it does not require a large density of grazers to control epiphyte biomass even when nutrient loading rates are substantially elevated.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 45
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]   A temporal investigation of grazer dynamics, nutrients, seagrass leaf productivity, and epiphyte standing stock [J].
Frankovich, TA ;
Zieman, JC .
ESTUARIES, 2005, 28 (01) :41-52
[22]   An experimental test of the capacity of food web interactions (fish-epiphytes-seagrasses) to offset the negative consequences of eutrophication on seagrass communities [J].
Gacia, E ;
Littler, MM ;
Littler, DS .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 1999, 48 (06) :757-766
[23]  
GAISER E, 2008, PERIPHYTON ACCUMULAT
[24]   Nutrient impacts on epifaunal density and species composition in a subtropical seagrass bed [J].
Gil, Melissa ;
Armitage, Anna R. ;
Fourqurean, James W. .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2006, 569 (1) :437-447
[25]   Macroalgal canopies contribute to eelgrass (Zostera marina) decline in temperate estuarine ecosystems [J].
Hauxwell, J ;
Cebrián, J ;
Furlong, C ;
Valiela, I .
ECOLOGY, 2001, 82 (04) :1007-1022
[26]   The primacy of top-down effects in shallow benthic ecosystems [J].
Heck, K. L., Jr. ;
Valentine, J. F. .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2007, 30 (03) :371-381
[27]  
Heck KL, 2006, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V326, P145
[28]   Effects of nutrient enrichment and small predator density on seagrass ecosystems: An experimental assessment [J].
Heck, KL ;
Pennock, JR ;
Valentine, JF ;
Coen, LD ;
Sklenar, SA .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2000, 45 (05) :1041-1057
[29]  
HOLMQUIST JG, 1989, B MAR SCI, V44, P348
[30]  
HOOTSMANS MJM, 1985, AQUAT BOT, V22, P83, DOI 10.1016/0304-3770(85)90032-4