Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch

被引:371
作者
Douglas, R. Duane [1 ]
Steinhauer, Tad J.
Wee, Alvin G.
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Sch Dent Med, Alton, IL 62002 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Arthur James Canc Hosp, Coll Dent, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
SMALL COLOR DIFFERENCES; EXTRACTED HUMAN-TEETH; DENTAL PORCELAIN; CERAMIC CROWNS; TOOTH COLOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. Purpose. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. Material and methods. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradionleter was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (Delta E) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 Delta E unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 Delta E units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. Results. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 Delta E units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 Delta E. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P <.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Conclusions. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptabilitv for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 208
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   THE CONVERSION OF CHROMASCAN DESIGNATIONS TO CIE TRISTIMULUS VALUES [J].
BANGTSON, LK ;
GOODKIND, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 48 (05) :610-617
[2]  
Bergman B, 1999, INT J PROSTHODONT, V12, P135
[3]   A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHADE-MATCHING PROCEDURES [J].
CULPEPPER, WD .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1970, 24 (02) :166-+
[4]   Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns [J].
Douglas, RD ;
Brewer, JD .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 79 (03) :254-260
[5]   SURVEY OF PATIENT ATTITUDES TOWARD CURRENT ESTHETIC PROCEDURES [J].
GOLDSTEIN, RE ;
LANCASTER, JS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 52 (06) :775-780
[6]  
Goodkin R, 2000, SURG NEUROL, V53, P105
[7]   Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides [J].
Hammad, IA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (01) :50-53
[8]   Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns [J].
Haselton, DR ;
Diaz-Arnold, AM ;
Hillis, SL .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 83 (04) :396-401
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF APPEARANCE MATCH BY VISUAL OBSERVATION AND CLINICAL COLORIMETRY [J].
JOHNSTON, WM ;
KAO, EC .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (05) :819-822
[10]  
KUEHNI RG, 1979, COLOR RES APPL, V4, P83