A Biology Core Concept Instrument (BCCI) to Teach and Assess Student Conceptual Understanding

被引:9
作者
Cary, Tawnya L. [1 ]
Wienhold, Caroline J. [2 ]
Branchaw, Janet [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beloit Coll, Dept Biol, Beloit, WI 53511 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Wisconsin Inst Sci Educ & Community Engagement, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Kinesiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
MISCONCEPTIONS; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.18-09-0192
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instruments for teaching and assessing student understanding of the five core concepts in biology from Vision and Change are needed. We developed four Biology Core Concept Instruments (BCCIs) that teach and assess students' ability to describe a concept in their own words, identify concepts represented in biological phenomena, and make connections between concepts. The BCCI includes a narrative, followed by a series of 10 true-false/identify (TF/I) and three open-ended questions. The TF/I questions are aligned with Cary and Branchaw's Conceptual Elements Framework and were iteratively developed with feedback from biology experts and student performance and feedback obtained during think-aloud interviews. A component scoring system was developed to discriminate between a student's ability to apply and identify each core concept from his or her ability to make connections between concepts. We field-tested the BCCIs (n = 152-191) with students in a first-year course focused on learning the five core concepts in biology and collected evidence of interrater reliability (alpha = 0.70) and item validity. With component scoring, we identified examples in which students were able to identify concepts singularly, but not make connections between concepts, or were better able to apply concepts to one biological phenomenon than another. Identifying these nuanced differences in learning can guide instruction to improve students' conceptual understanding.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[32]  
Larkin J.H., 1980, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, V1980, P51, DOI [10.1002/tl.37219800206, DOI 10.1002/TL.37219800206]
[33]   VALIDITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT - VALIDATION OF INFERENCES FROM PERSONS RESPONSES AND PERFORMANCES AS SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY INTO SCORE MEANING [J].
MESSICK, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 50 (09) :741-749
[34]   Students' misconceptions about perceived physiological responses [J].
Michael, JA .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 1998, 19 (01) :S90-S98
[35]  
National Research Council (US) Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century, 2003, Bio2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists
[36]   Biology majors' knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection [J].
Nehm, Ross H. ;
Reilly, Leah .
BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (03) :263-272
[37]  
Redline C, 2001, P ANN M AM STAT ASS
[38]  
Reece JB., 2011, Campbell biology, V9
[39]   Contemporary Test Validity in Theory and Practice: A Primer for Discipline-Based Education Researchers [J].
Reeves, Todd D. ;
Marbach-Ad, Gili .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 15 (01)
[40]   Assessment of Genetics Understanding Under What Conditions Do Situational Features Have an Impact on Measures? [J].
Schmiemann, Philipp ;
Nehm, Ross H. ;
Tornabene, Robyn E. .
SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2017, 26 (10) :1161-1191