Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-assisted removable partial dentures

被引:25
作者
Eom, Ju-Won [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Young-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Myung-Joo [1 ,2 ]
Kwon, Ho-Beom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
PARTIAL DENTAL PROSTHESIS; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; BIOMECHANICAL RATIONALE; EDENTULOUS MAXILLA; CLINICAL REPORT; DIAMETER; LENGTH; OVERDENTURE; GEOMETRY; POSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Whether the implant abutment in implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) functions as a natural removable partial denture (RPD) tooth abutment is unknown. Purpose. The purpose of this 3-dimensional finite element study was to analyze the biomechanical behavior of implant crown, bone, RPD, and IARPD. Material and methods. Finite element models of the partial maxilla, teeth, and prostheses were generated on the basis of a patient's computed tomographic data. The teeth, surveyed crowns, and RPDs were created in the model. With the generated components, four 3-dimensional finite element models of the partial maxilla were constructed: tooth-supported RPD (TB), implant supported RPD (IB), tooth-tissue-supported RPD (TT), and implant-tissue-supported RPD (IT) models. Oblique loading of 300 N was applied on the crowns and denture teeth. The von Mises stress and displacement of the denture abutment tooth and implant system were identified. Results. The highest von Mises stress values of both IARPDs occurred on the implants, while those of both natural tooth RPDs occurred on the frameworks of the RPDs. The highest von Mises stress of model IT was about twice that of model IB, while the value of model TT was similar to that of model TB. The maximum displacement was greater in models TB and TT than in models IB and IT. Among the 4 models, the highest maximum displacement value was observed in the model TT and the lowest value was in the model IB. Conclusions. Finite element analysis revealed that the stress distribution pattern of the IARPDs was different from that of the natural tooth RPDs and the stress distribution of implant-supported RPD was different from that of implant-tissue-supported RPD. When implants are used for RPD abutments, more consideration concerning the RPD design and the number or location of the implant is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 742
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Anitua E, 2010, INT J PERIODONT REST, V30, P89
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT DIAMETER AND LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS RELATED TO CRESTAL BONE GEOMETRY: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS [J].
Baggi, Luigi ;
Cappelloni, Ilaria ;
Di Girolamo, Michele ;
Maceri, Franco ;
Vairo, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (06) :422-431
[3]  
Budtz-Jorgensen E, 2000, Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, V12, P765
[4]   The Use of Dental Implants in Combination with Removable Partial Dentures. A Case Report [J].
Chronopoulos, Vassilios ;
Sarafianou, Aspasia ;
Kourtis, Stefanos .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 20 (06) :355-364
[5]  
de Carvalho W R, 2001, Implant Dent, V10, P280
[6]   Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature [J].
Geng, JP ;
Tan, KBC ;
Liu, GR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (06) :585-598
[7]   Maximum Dislodging Forces of Mandibular Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Dentures: In Vitro Assessment [J].
Gharehchahi, Jafar ;
Asadzadeh, Nafiseh ;
Mirmortazavi, Amirtaher ;
Shakeri, Mohammad Taghi .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (07) :543-549
[8]   Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution:: A finite element analysis [J].
Himmlová, L ;
Dostálová, T ;
Kácovsky, A ;
Konvicková, S .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 91 (01) :20-25
[9]  
Jang Y, 1998, Implant Dent, V7, P199, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199807030-00007
[10]  
Keltjens H M, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P208