Assessment of Implant Stability in Immediate Implant Placement using Different Bone Grafting materials: A Clinical Study

被引:2
作者
Jalaluddin, Mohammad [1 ]
Sathe, Saurabh [2 ]
Thomas, Joyce [3 ]
Haleem, Shaista [4 ]
Naik, Sachin [5 ,6 ]
Shivanna, Madhuniranjanswamy Mahalakshmamma [7 ]
机构
[1] KIIT Deemed Univ, Kalinga Inst Dent Sci, Dept Periodont & Oral Implantol, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
[2] Bhabha Coll Dent Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Al Azhar Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India
[4] Inaya Med Coll, Dent Hlth Care Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dent Hlth Dept, Dent Biomat Res Chair, Riyadh 1143, Saudi Arabia
[6] Texila Amer Univ, Publ Hlth Dept, Georgetown, Guyana
[7] Penang Int Dent Coll, Dept Community Dent, Jalan Bagan, Butterworth, Penang, Malaysia
关键词
Bone grafting; immediate implant; implant stability; marginal bone loss; AUGMENTATION; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_627_20
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the implant stability in immediate implant placement using different bone grafting materials. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients (5 males, 7 females, range of 40-58 years) were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups based on the graft material used. For Group 1, Xenograft bone grafting material was used, and for Group 2, Freeze-dried bone allograft was used. The patients were suggested to rinse with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth wash for 1 min. Periotome was used for atraumatic tooth extraction, and necessary care was taken to avoid fracture of socket wall. The implant was placed with respective bone grafting materials. An Orthopantomogram (OPG) radiograph is taken at the day of the operation to serve as baseline data for the marginal bone level. Clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months to assess the mean marginal bone level changes. Periotest was used for the measurement of implant stability. Results: The mean marginal bone level in Group 1 at baseline (13.58 +/- 1.09), 3 months (12.64 +/- 0.88), 6 months (12.02 +/- 1.42), and 12 months (11.20 +/- 1.26), respectively. In Group 2, the marginal bone level was at baseline (14.22 +/- 0.26), 3 months (13.52 +/- 1.28), 6 months (13.10 +/- 0.32), and 12 months (12.12 +/- 1.26), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference found in both the groups. Moreover, there was no statistically significant differences found between the groups at all the duration on intergroup comparison of the mean marginal bone level. The mean difference of implant stability in Group 1 the implant stability was 188.6 +/- 22.5 and in Group 2 was 191.5 +/- 18.2, and there was no statistically significant difference found between the groups. Conclusion: Both bone grafting materials used in the study showed improvement in implant stability and marginal bone levels after immediate placement of implant.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 615
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? [J].
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Silva, Cleverson O. ;
Misawa, Monica ;
Sukekava, Flavia .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2015, 68 (01) :122-134
[2]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[3]   Bone formation in sinus augmentation procedures using autologous bone, porcine bone, and a 50:50 mixture: a human clinical and histological evaluation at 2months [J].
Cassetta, Michele ;
Perrotti, Vittoria ;
Calasso, Sabrina ;
Piattelli, Adriano ;
Sinjari, Bruna ;
Iezzi, Giovanna .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (10) :1180-1184
[4]  
Grunder U, 2000, INT J PERIODONT REST, V20, P11
[5]   Impacts of 3D bone-to-implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant [J].
Hsu, Jui-Ting ;
Shen, Yen-Wen ;
Kuo, Chih-Wei ;
Wang, Ruei-Teng ;
Fuh, Lih-Jyh ;
Huang, Heng-Li .
JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 116 (08) :582-590
[6]   Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence [J].
Pjetursson, B. E. ;
Lang, N. P. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 35 :72-79
[7]  
Prathapachandran Jayachandran, 2012, Dent Res J (Isfahan), V9, P516
[8]  
Schropp L, 2003, INT J PERIODONT REST, V23, P313
[9]  
Schropp L, 2003, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V18, P189
[10]  
Zuffetti F, 2013, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V6, P239