Do unemployment insurance recipients actively seek work?: Evidence from randomized trials in four US States

被引:54
作者
Ashenfelter, O [1 ]
Ashmore, D
Deschênes, O
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Econ, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
unemployment insurance; randomized experiments; work search verification;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we report the results of the only field test of which we are aware that uses randomized trials to measure whether stricter enforcement and verification of work search behavior alone decreases unemployment claims and benefits paid in the U.S. unemployment insurance (UI) program. These experiments, which were implemented in four U.S. sites in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Virginia and Tennessee, were designed to explicitly test claims based on nonexperimental data, summarized in Burgess and Kingston (An Incentives Approach to Improving the Unemployment Compensation System, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1987), that a prime cause of overpayments is the failure of claimants to actively seek work. Our results provide 110 Support for the view that the failure to actively search for work has been a cause of overpayment in the UI system. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 75
页数:23
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, LOSING GROUND
[2]  
BLAUSTEIN SJ, 1997, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURAN
[3]  
BURGESS PL, 1987, INCENTIVES APPROACH
[4]  
CORSON W, 1989, 893 US DEP LAB EMPL
[5]  
CORSON W, 1988, 881 US DEP LAB EMPL
[6]  
CORSON W, 1985, 852 US DEP LAB EMPL
[7]  
Decker P. T., 1997, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURAN
[8]   The effect of sample selection and initial conditions in duration models: Evidence from experimental data on training [J].
Ham, JC ;
LaLonde, RJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (01) :175-205
[9]  
Hausman J.A., 1985, SOCIAL EXPT, P187
[10]   Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: Accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Smith, J ;
Clements, N .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) :487-535