Contemporary use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical patients An observational cohort study

被引:8
作者
Dias, Priyanthi [1 ]
Patel, Akshaykumar [1 ]
Rook, William [2 ]
Edwards, Mark R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pearse, Rupert M. [1 ]
Abbott, Tom E. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, William Harvey Res Inst, London, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, Acute Crit & Perioperat Care Res Grp, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
SITE INFECTION; GUIDELINES; SURGERY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CHECKLIST; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000001619
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial prophylaxis is commonly used to prevent surgical site infection (SSI), despite concerns of overuse leading to antimicrobial resistance. However, it is unclear how often antimicrobials are used and whether guidelines are followed. OBJECTIVES To describe contemporary clinical practice for antimicrobial prophylaxis including guideline compliance, the rate of postoperative infection and associated side effects. DESIGN A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study. SETTING Twelve United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. PARTICIPANTS One thousand one hundred and sixteen patients, aged at least 18 years undergoing specific colo-rectal, obstetric, gynaecological, urological or orthopaedic surgical procedures. EXPOSURE Compliance with guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis. OUTCOMES The primary outcome was SSI within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were number of doses of antimicrobials for prophylaxis and to treat infection, incidence of antimicrobial-related side effects and mortality within 30 days after surgery. Data are presented as number with percentage (%) or median with interquartile range [IQR]. Results of logistic regression analyses are presented as odds ratio/rate ratio (OR/RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS 1102 out of 1106 (99.6%) patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis, which was compliant with local guidelines in 929 out of 1102 (84.3%) cases. 2169 out of 51 28 (42.3%) doses of antimicrobials were administered as prophylaxis (median 1 [1 to 2] dose) and 2959 out of 5128 (57.7%) were administered to treat an infection (median 21 [11 to 28] doses). 56 patients (5.2%) developed SSI. Antimicrobial prophylaxis administered according to local guidelines was not associated with a lower incidence of SSI compared with administration outside guidelines [OR 0.90 (0.35 to 2.29); P = 0.823]. 23 out of 1072 (2.2%) patients experienced a side effect of antimicrobial therapy. 7 out of 1082 (0.6%) patients died. The median hospital stay was 3 [1 to 5] days. CONCLUSION Antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered for almost all the surgical procedures under investigation. However, this was not always compliant with guidelines. Further research is required to determine whether the amount of prophylactic antimicrobials could be safely and effectively reduced without increasing the incidence of SSI.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 539
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Fowler AF., 2021, REVIEW
  • [12] GlobalSurg Collaborative, 2018, Lancet Infect Dis, V18, P516, DOI [10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4, 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30101-4]
  • [13] Anaesthesia, surgery, and life-threatening allergic reactions: epidemiology and clinical features of perioperative anaphylaxis in the 6th National Audit Project (NAP6)
    Harper, N. J. N.
    Cook, T. M.
    Garcez, T.
    Farmer, L.
    Floss, K.
    Marinho, S.
    Torevell, H.
    Warner, A.
    Ferguson, K.
    Hitchman, J.
    Egner, W.
    Kemp, H.
    Thomas, M.
    Lucas, D. N.
    Nasser, S.
    Karanam, S.
    Kong, K. -L.
    Farooque, S.
    Bellamy, M.
    McGuire, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (01) : 159 - 171
  • [14] Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention
    Haynes, Alex B.
    Weiser, Thomas G.
    Berry, William R.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Breizat, Abdel-Hadi S.
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    Dziekan, Gerald
    Herbosa, Teodoro
    Kibatala, Pascience L.
    Lapitan, Marie Carmela M.
    Merry, Alan F.
    Reznick, Richard K.
    Taylor, Bryce
    Vats, Amit
    Gawande, Atul A.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [15] Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance
    Holmes, Alison H.
    Moore, Luke S. P.
    Sundsfjord, Arnfinn
    Steinbakk, Martin
    Regmi, Sadie
    Karkey, Abhilasha
    Guerin, Philippe J.
    Piddock, Laura J. V.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10014) : 176 - 187
  • [16] CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting
    Horan, Teresa C.
    Andrus, Mary
    Dudeck, Margaret A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2008, 36 (05) : 309 - 332
  • [17] Surgical site infection: poor compliance with guidelines and care bundles
    Leaper, David J.
    Tanner, Judith
    Kiernan, Martin
    Assadian, Ojan
    Edmiston, Charles E., Jr.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (03) : 357 - 362
  • [18] Comparative epidemiology of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions
    Mertes, Paul Michel
    Ebo, Didier G.
    Garcez, Tomaz
    Rose, Michael
    Sabato, Vito
    Takazawa, Tomonori
    Cooke, Peter J.
    Clarke, Russell C.
    Dewachter, Pascale
    Garvey, Lene H.
    Guttormsen, Anne B.
    Hepner, David L.
    Hopkins, Phil M.
    Khan, David A.
    Kolawole, Helen
    Kopac, Peter
    Kroigaard, Mogens
    Laguna, Jose J.
    Marshall, Stuart D.
    Platt, Peter R.
    Sadleir, Paul H. M.
    Savic, Louise C.
    Savic, Sinisa
    Volcheck, Gerald W.
    Voltolini, Susanna
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 123 (01) : E16 - E28
  • [19] Surgical site infection and costs in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the economic burden
    Monahan, Mark
    Jowett, Susan
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Morton, Dion G.
    Abdali, Zainab
    Roberts, Tracy E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [20] NICE, 2020, NICE Guideline, No. 125