Moving to a Low-Carbon Economy in China: Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Emission and Economy from a Sector Perspective

被引:47
作者
Jiang, Rui [1 ]
Zhou, Yulin [1 ]
Li, Rongrong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
decoupling status; decomposition; sector perspective; carbon emissions; China; CO2; EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; INDUSTRIAL-GROWTH; JIANGSU PROVINCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LMDI METHOD; DRIVERS; FINLAND; LINKAGE;
D O I
10.3390/su10040978
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding decoupling China's emissions from the economy and identifying the drivers of emissions at a sector perspective can facilitate China's move to a low-carbon economy that makes economic growth compatible with carbon reduction. This study combined decoupling and decomposition econometric techniques to quantify both the decoupling effects and the driving elements of carbon emissions in China's six major sectors. The study found that the leading source of all carbon emissions in China come from the industrial sector, followed by the 'Other' sectors and the Transport sector. Further, the decoupling status in those sectors differed: Construction (weak decoupling), other (weak decoupling), Trade (weak decoupling), Industry (weak decoupling), Transport (expansive coupling) and Agriculture (expansive negative decoupling). Finally, the economic output effect becomes the major contributor for carbon emissions among these six sectors, followed by the energy intensity effect. However, the energy structure effect and carbon coefficient effect are both weak.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions: A decomposition analysis of Italian energy consumption [J].
Andreoni, V. ;
Galmarini, S. .
ENERGY, 2012, 44 (01) :682-691
[2]   LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation [J].
Ang, B. W. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 :233-238
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]  
[Anonymous], SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9050793
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SUST DEV IND MEAS DE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EC MANAGEMENT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9061013
[8]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH, CARRYING-CAPACITY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
ARROW, K ;
BOLIN, B ;
COSTANZA, R ;
DASGUPTA, P ;
FOLKE, C ;
HOLLING, CS ;
JANSSON, BO ;
LEVIN, S ;
MALER, KG ;
PERRINGS, C ;
PIMENTEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5210) :520-521
[9]   Decoupling factors on the energy-output linkage: The Spanish case [J].
Climent, Francisco ;
Pardo, Angel .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :522-528
[10]   Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil [J].
de Freitas, Luciano Charlita ;
Kaneko, Shinji .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (08) :1459-1469